Chevron International Oil Company Ltd v A/S Sea Team (T.S. Havprins)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1983
Year1983
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 cases
  • The "Andres Bonifacio"
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 22 September 1993
    ... ... were not owners of the assets of the company: see The `Evpo Agnic` at p 413. Accordingly, ... Further, in `The TS Havprins` , Staughton J stated that the ... ...
  • London Borough of Hackney v P
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 29 July 2022
    ...factor should be determined by the law of the court in which the proceedings are brought, the lex fori. In Chevron International Oil Co Ltd v A/S Sea Team (The TS Havprins) [1983] 2 Lloyd's Rep 356 approved the following statement in Dicey at [1–081]: “A fundamental problem in the conflict......
  • Partenreederei M/S 'Heidberg' v Grosvenor Grain and Feed Company Ltd (The Heidberg)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • Invalid date
  • The “Min Rui”
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 5 September 2016
    ...Ship MV ‘Cape Moreton’ (ex ‘Freya’) [2005] FCAFC 68 (refd) Tjaskemolen, TheUNK [1997] 2 Lloyd's Rep 465 (refd) TS Havprins, TheUNK [1983] 2 Lloyd's Rep 356 (refd) Legislation referred to High Court (Admiralty Jurisdiction) Act (Cap 123, 2001 Rev Ed) s 4(4)(i) (consd); ss 3(1)(g), 3(1)(h), 4......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • IN PERSONAM LIABILITY, BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP AND THE ACTION IN REM
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1994, December 1994
    • 1 December 1994
    ...at [1980] 2 M.L.J. 217 at 220. The relevant passage from Lord Diplock’s judgment is set out in the text to note 124 infra. 114 [1983] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 356. In this case, Straughton J. applied English law as the lex foxi to determine the applicable connecting factor and added that it is the le......
  • RATIONALISING AND SIMPLIFYING THE PRESUMPTION OF SIMILARITY OF LAWS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2016, December 2016
    • 1 December 2016
    ...would satisfy the requirement of proof of a contract being governed by the lex fori. Chevron International Oil Co Ltd v A/S Sea Team[1983] 2 Lloyd's Rep 356 may seem to have contradicted the reasoning of the court in The Parouth. There was no difference in the material facts save that the c......
  • THE RELEVANCE OF FOREIGN LAW TO THE EXTRA-TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF LOCAL COURTS: METALL UND ROHSTOFF AND THE TS HAVPRINS REVISITED
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2000, December 2000
    • 1 December 2000
    ...dicenti, impune non paretur.’ See also Tan Yock Lin, Conflicts Issues in Family and Succession (1993), at 11. 4 [1990] 1 QB 391. 5 [1983] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 356. 6 For example, Fentiman, ‘Tort—Jurisdiction or Choice of Law? [1989] CLJ 191; Tan Yock Lin, ‘Choice of Law in a Question of Jurisdicti......
  • JURISDICTION ISSUES IN INTERNATIONAL TORT LITIGATION: A SINGAPORE VIEW
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1995, December 1995
    • 1 December 1995
    ...lex fori approach: see Kahn-Freund, General Problems in Private International Law (1980) 227—231. But contra The T S Havprins[1983] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 356, where Staughton J considered the lex fori domestic meaning to be applicable for the meaning of “contract” for the contract heads of Order 11......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT