Child v Hearn
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1865 |
| Date | 1865 |
| Court | Exchequer |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Mills v Armstrong. The "Bernina"
...v. WarmanENRENR 2 C. B. N. S. 740 5 C. B. N. S. 573 Waite v. The North-Eastern Railway CompanyENR E. B. & E. 719 Child v. HearnENR L. Rep. 9 Ex. 176 Armstrong v. The Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway CompanyENR 33 L. T. Rep. N. S. 228 L. Rep. 10. Ex. 47 The MilanENR Lush. 388 Hay v. Le Neve ......
-
Cox v Burbridge
...C. P. 89; 9 Jur. N. S. 970; 11 W. R. 435. See Fletcher v. Rylands, 1866-68, L. R. 1 Ex. 281; L. R. 3 H. L. 330; Child v. Hearn, 1874, L. R. 9 Ex. 176. Referred to, Ponting v. Noakes, [1894] 2 Q. B. 290. Distinguished, Brady v. Warren, [1900] 2 I. R. 646; Sullivan v. Creed, [1904] 2 I. R. 32......
-
Mills v Armstrong. The "Bernina"
...Company, 18 L. T. Rep, N. S.82; L. Rep. 3 Q. B. 555; Rigby V. Hewitt, 5 Ef. 240; Greenland v. Chaplies, 5 Ex. 243; Child v. Hearn, L. Rep. 9 Ex. 176; Dudman v. Dublin Port and Docks Board, 7 Ir. Rep. Com. L. 518; Lockhart v. Lichtenthaler, 48 Penn. 151; Wabash, St. Louis, and Pacific Railwa......
-
Lee v Riley
...11 Jur. N. S. 527; 13 W. R. 751. Followed, Ellis v. Loftus Iron Company, 1874, L. R. 10 C. P. 12. Discussed, Child v. Hearn, 1874, L. R. 9 Ex. 176; Smith v. Cook, 1875, 1 Q. B. D. 83. . 14*9- ò*ò 6.3-7*-ò 18C,E(H. g.)m LEE V. RILBY 629 chab.le$ lee, Appellant; samuel riley, Respondent. May ......