Clemens v Clemens Bros. Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1976
Date1976
CourtChancery Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
24 cases
  • Re S Q Wong Holdings (Pte) Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 28 May 1987
    ...Earle [1902] AC 83 (refd) Chi Liung & Son Ltd,Re; Tong Chong Fah v Tong Lee Hwa [1968] 1 MLJ 97 (refd) Clemens v Clemens Brothers Ltd [1976] 2 All ER 268 (refd) Greenhalgh v Arderne Cinemas Ltd [1946] 1 All ER 512 (folld) Howard Smith Ltd v Ampol Petroleum Ltd [1974] AC 821; [1974] 1 All ER......
  • Seow Hoon Hin v Hartalega Holdings Bhd and Others [2019] 5 MLJ 421
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Re Halt Garage (1964) Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
  • Chong and Others v Alexander and another
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 8 April 2016
    ...as directors in accordance with their requisition, they would apply for an injunction, relying on the authority of Clemens v Clemens Bros Ltd & Anr [1976] 2 All ER 268. 89 That letter elicited two letters in response from solicitors then instructed by Mrs Alexander, each dated 2 December 20......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Consequences Of Keeping Minority Shareholders Out In The Cold
    • Cayman Islands
    • Mondaq Cayman Islands
    • 2 July 2015
    ...(1883) 23 Ch D 14. 3 [1887] 6 Ch D 70. 4 [1950] 2 All ER 1064. 5 [1990] 1 Ch 170 (CA). 6 (1887) 12 App Cas 589. 7 [1902] AC 83 (PC). 8 [1976] 2 All ER 268. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your......
4 books & journal articles
  • Statutêre minderheidsbeskerming in Suid-Afrika. Hoofstuk 5
    • South Africa
    • Sabinet Transactions of the Centre for Business Law No. 2004-36, January 2004
    • 1 January 2004
    ...min aandag in die Suid-Afrikaansemaatskappyereg geniet.65 Weens ’n gebrek aan omvangryke reg-58 Clemens v Clemens Bros Ltd [1976] 2 All E R 268 (Ch). Sien ook VanRooyen “Enkele perspektiewe oor die reël dat die lede van ’n maat-skappy hul stemreg na wens kan uitoefen en die ongeldigheid van......
  • Bibliografie
    • South Africa
    • Sabinet Transactions of the Centre for Business Law No. 2004-36, January 2004
    • 1 January 2004
    ...1 BCC 98,951Carruth v Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd [1937] AC 707Castleburn Ltd, Re (1989) 5 BCC 652 (Ch)Clemens v Clemens Bros Ltd [1976] 2 All ER 268Company, Re a [1986] BCLC 382“ Re a, Ex parte Schwarcz (No 2) [1989] BCLC 427“ (No 002567 of 1982), Re a [1983] 1 WLR 927“ (No 004475 of ......
  • Begripstoeligting. Hoofstuk 2
    • South Africa
    • Sabinet Transactions of the Centre for Business Law No. 2004-36, January 2004
    • 1 January 2004
    ...verband 2.4.3.1 hierna.57 Sien bv Estmanco (Kilner House) Ltd v GLC [1982] 1 WLR 2; [1982]1 All ER 437; Clemens v Clemens Bros Ltd [1976] 2 All ER 268; Smithv Croft (No 3) (1987) 3 BCC 218.58 Sien bv Gundelfinger v African Textile Manufacturers Ltd 1939 AD 314.Sien in die algemeen Van Rooye......
  • The unanimous shareholder agreement: bane or boon for shareholders?
    • Barbados
    • Caribbean Law Review No. 10-1, June 2000
    • 1 June 2000
    ...the Articles as an alternative statutory vehicle 98 See Gower, supra-, Chapter 22 at pp.591 and 606; Clemens v. Clemens Brothers Ltd. [1976] 2 All E.R. 268 [although this decision may be based in part on the oppression remedy]. 99 See sections 242 to 245 of the Companies Act and sections 22......