Cointat v Myham & Son
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1913 |
| Date | 1913 |
| Court | King's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
17 cases
- Askey v Golden Wine Company
-
Safeway Stores Ltd and Others v Twigger and Others
...negligence. I am aware that as to the recoverability of a fine in civil proceedings there are conflicting decisions. Thus, in Cointat v. Myham & Son [1913] 2 K.B 220, both fine and costs were held recoverable, while in R. Leslie Ltd. v. Reliable Advertising and Addressing Agency Ltd. [191......
- Britannia Hygienic Laundry Company v Thornycroft and Company
-
Marles v Philip Trant & Sons Ltd (no 2)
...by reason of re-selling it to his customers, (see Orange v. Fry, reported in 1903 67 Justice of the Peace Reports at page 240; Cointat v. Myham & Son, reported in 1913 2 King's Bench Division at page 220; Weld-Blundell v. Stephens, reported in 1919 1 King's Bench Division at page 539) provi......
Request a trial to view additional results