Combining multiple approaches to valuing in the MUVA female economic empowerment programme

AuthorJulian King
Published date01 December 2019
Date01 December 2019
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X19893080
Subject MatterPraxis
https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X19893080
Evaluation Journal of Australasia
2019, Vol. 19(4) 217 –225
© The Author(s) 2019
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/1035719X19893080
journals.sagepub.com/home/evj
Combining multiple
approaches to valuing in the
MUVA female economic
empowerment programme
Julian King
Julian King & Associates Limited, New Zealand
The University of Melbourne, Australia
Abstract
Evaluation and economics each have distinct approaches to valuing. These approaches
are traditionally separated by disciplinary boundaries. However, they can and should
be combined. Value for money (VFM), in particular, is a shared domain of the two
disciplines, because it is an evaluative question about the economic problem of
resource use. A theoretical and practical model for combining valuing approaches has
been developed through doctoral research. This article presents and reflects on an
example – an international development programme where VFM has been assessed
using mixed methods (qualitative, quantitative and economic). Under this approach,
evaluative reasoning provides the means for integrating economic values with other
criteria and evidence. Deliberation with stakeholders strengthens the valuing process,
enhancing validity, credibility and use.
Keywords
cost–benefit analysis, economics, evaluation, rubrics, valuing
Introduction
Everybody seems to be talking about value for money (VFM) these days. In the con-
text of constrained resources, competing policy priorities and political pressures to be
accountable for stewardship of public funds, decision makers want to know whether
Corresponding author:
Julian King, Honorary Fellow, Centre for Program Evaluation, University of Melbourne, 110 Leicester St,
Carlton VIC 3053, Australia.
Email: jk@julianking.co.nz
893080EVJ0010.1177/1035719X19893080Evaluation Journal of AustralasiaKing
research-article2019
Praxis

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT