Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Buchanan

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLORD JUSTICE SELLERS
Judgment Date13 March 1957
Judgment citation (vLex)[1957] EWCA Civ J0313-4
CourtCourt of Appeal
Date13 March 1957

[1957] EWCA Civ J0313-4

In The Supreme Court of Judicature

Court of Appeal

Before:

The Lord Chier Justice of England

Lord Justice Jenkins and

Lord Justice Sellers

Commissioners of Inland Revenue
Appellants.
and
Major H.A.D. Buchanan
Respondent.

MR JOHN PENNYCUICK, Q.C., MR E.B. STAMP and SIR REGINALD HILLS (instructed by the Solicitor of Inland Revenue. Somerset House, Strand, W.C.2.) appeared as Counsel on behalf of the Appellants.

The HON. CHARLES RUSSELL, Q.C., and MR H.H. MONROE (instructed by Messrs. Travers Smith, Braithwaite & Co., 4, Throgmorton Avenue, E.C.2.) appeared as Counsel on behalf of the Respondent.

1

THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE OF ENGLAND: This is an appeal from a judgment of Mr Justice Vaisey who dismissed an appeal from a decision of the Special Commissioners given in favour of the Respondent, Major Buchanan, though on a different ground. The question that is raised is whether Major Buchanan, who was then the husband of Lady Dufferin, is liable to surtax as her husband (her income, of course, being aggregated with his for surtax purposes) and whether, he being, as I say, liable to surtax, there must be brought into the computation sums of money which were paid to the children of Lady Dufferin by her first marriage by reason of the conditions of section 21 of the Finance Act, 1936.

2

I shall state the facts as shortly as I can. Lady Dufferin was the grand-daughter of the first Lord Iveagh who divided his property into three shares giving one share to each son; one of the sons, Mr Arthur Guinness, was Lady Dufferin's father. Lord Iveagh died on the 7th October, 1927, his will being proved on the 2nd November, 1927; under that will the sons took a life interest in their share and then the life interest passed to the children and the children's children who were living at the time of Lord Iveagh's death, so Lord Iveagh's grandchildren got an interest.

3

On the 8th March, 1948, the will having been proved in November, 1927, Lady Dufferin executed a deed of surrender under which she surrendered any interest in the one-third share which she would have in her father's share, because Mr Arthur Guinness had three children; she surrendered any share that she might have in that share which would come from her father. She, of course, at the time when she executed this deed of surrender, had not got a life interest in possession, because her father was still alive, but, on the day following the surrender which she executed, her father, Mr Arthur Guinness, surrendered his interest which would have passed to Lady Dufferin but for the surrender which she had executed. The result of it was that the persons who became entitled under the terms of Lord Iveagh's will – which I will mention in a moment – were Lady Dufferin's children. Under Lord Iveagh's will, it was provided that if any of these beneficiaries who had a life interest attempted to dispose of his life interest, the life interest was forfeited, subject to this exception and provision: "Any such life tenant" may at any time surrender such life interest or any part thereof to or in "favour of the person or any one or more of the persons who would be entitled thereto or to some share thereof or of the trust premises in" which it subsists" -,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • D'Abreu v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 7 Marzo 1978
    ...reversionary interest) within the meaning of s 437 of the same Act. The taxpayer contended that Buchanan v. Commissioners of Inland Revenue37 TC 365; [1958] Ch 289 was distinguishable; alternatively Jean and Ann effected their dispositions jointly, so that s 442 applied and the income in qu......
  • Grey v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 2 Noviembre 1959
  • Officeserve Technologies Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) and Another v Cecil Anthony-Mike
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 28 Julio 2017
    ...amount to a "disposition" for the purposes of section 44(1) of the 1940 Act. 69. In another revenue case, Inland Revenue Comrs v Buchanan [1958] Ch 289, the Court of Appeal held that the surrender of a life interest under a will trust in favour of those people entitled in remainder operated......
  • Akers and Others v Samba Financial Group
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 1 Febrero 2017
    ... ... Mines Ltd [ 1910 ] 2 Ch 502 , CA Corbett v Comrs of Inland Revenue [ 1938 ] 1 KB 567 ; [ 1937 ] 4 All ER 700 , CA ... 597 ; [ 2012 ] 3 All ER 210 , CA Inland Revenue Comrs v Buchanan [ 1958 ] Ch 289 ; [ 1957 ] 3 WLR 68 ; [ 1957 ] 2 All ER ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT