Consistent Group Ltd v Kalwak and Others

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date2007
Neutral Citation[2007] UKEAT 0535_06_1805
Date2007
Year2007
CourtEmployment Appeal Tribunal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
56 cases
  • Council of the City of Sunderland v Brennan and Others (No 1)
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Appeal Tribunal
    • Invalid date
  • The Revenue Commissioners v Karshan (Midlands) Ltd T/A Dominos Pizza
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 20 October 2023
    ...into their agreements. Lord Clarke described the following statement from the judgment of Elias J. in Consistent Group Ltd v. Kalwak [2007] IRLR 560 as carrying ‘considerable force’ (at para. 58) ‘if the reality of the situation is that no-one seriously expects that a worker will seek to pr......
  • Weight Watchers (UK) Ltd v HM Revenue and Customs
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)
    • Invalid date
  • Uber BV v Aslam
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Appeal Tribunal
    • Invalid date
    ... ... Employment Appeal Tribunal Uber BV and others v Aslam and others UKEAT/ 56 / 17 2017 Sept 27 , 28 ; Nov 10 Judge ... ) Cheng Yuen v Royal Hong Kong Golf Club [ 1998 ] ICR 131 ,P C Consistent Group Ltd v Kalwak [ 2007 ] IRLR 560 ,E A T ;[ 2008 ] EWCA Civ 430 ; [ ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Recent UK Uber And Deliveroo Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 9 February 2018
    ...It is important to spot the difference between form and substance - the oft quoted dicta of Elias LJ in Kalwak v Consistent Group Ltd [2007] IRLR 560: 'The concern to which tribunals must be alive is that armies of lawyers will simply place substitution clauses, or clauses denying any oblig......
1 books & journal articles
  • A Purposive Approach to Employment Protection or a Missed Opportunity?
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 75-3, May 2012
    • 1 May 2012
    ...and his col-leagues were workers under the second limb definition. Both sides appealed.10 Employment Rights Act 1996,s 230(3)(b).11 [2007] IRLR 560 (EAT).12 [1967] 2 QB 786 (CA) 802 (Diplock LJ).13 Autoclenz Ltd vBelcher [2009] EAT 0160/08 at [18] (Peter Clark J).14 Kalwak [2007] n 11 above ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT