Cornick v Cornick

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1994
Date1994
Year1994
CourtFamily Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
38 cases
  • Richardson v Richardson and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 8 February 2011
    ...the policy. And if he did not do this then he cannot say that the subsequent revelation was an unforeseen or unforeseeable event: cf Cornick v Cornick [1994] 2 FLR 530, page 536. On the contrary, it was both foreseen and foreseeable. The husband could and would have established what was goi......
  • Horne v Horne
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 12 March 2009
    ...of the case.” That statement of principle was expanded and analysed in an influential judgment given by Hale J on 27 May 1994 in Cornick v Cornick [1994] 2 FLR 530. My citation comes at 536: “On analysis, therefore, there are three possible causes of a difference in the value of assets take......
  • Foster v Foster
    • Cayman Islands
    • Court of Appeal (Cayman Islands)
    • 4 August 2011
    ...2 W.L.R. 1350; [1987] 2 All E.R. 440, followed. (2) Brusewitz v. Brown, [1923] NZLR 1106, referred to. (3) Cornick v. Cornick (No. 1), [1994] 2 F.L.R. 530, followed. (4) Credit Lyonnais Bank Nederland N.V. v. Burch, [1997] 1 All E.R. 144; [1997] 2 F.C.R. 1; [1996] EWCA Civ 1292, referred to......
  • Leslie Dacosta Williams v Teleith Evelyn Williams
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 29 July 2022
    ...[15] on the statements of principle set out by Hale J (as she then was) after her review of the authorities in Cornick v Cornick [1994] 2 FLR 530, which were as follows: “On analysis, therefore, there are three possible causes of a difference in the value of assets taken into account at the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • COVID-19: Does The Pandemic Classify As A Barder Event?
    • Hong Kong
    • Mondaq Hong Kong
    • 25 August 2020
    ...cases, the applicants tried to reopen a financial order by arguing that the principles in Barder applied. Cornick v Cornick (No 1) [1994] 2 FLR 530 The wife applied for permission to appeal out of time against order for the husband to pay her a lump sum of '320,000 and for periodical paymen......
1 books & journal articles
  • Financial Remedies
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill The Single Family Court: a Practitioner's Handbook - 2nd Edition Contents
    • 30 August 2017
    ...hearing of an application for ancillary relief, each party must (unless the court directs otherwise) file with 183 Cornick v Cornick [1994] 2 FLR 530; Walkden v Walkden [2009] EWCA Civ 627, [2010] 1 FLR 174. 184 Myerson v Myerson [2009] EWCA Civ 282. 185 Williams v Lindley [2005] EWCA Civ 1......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT