Corrigenda
| DOI | 10.1177/1035719X20939327 |
| Date | 01 June 2020 |
| Published date | 01 June 2020 |
| Subject Matter | Corrigenda |
https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X20939327
Evaluation Journal of Australasia
2020, Vol. 20(2) 121
© The Author(s) 2020
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/1035719X20939327
journals.sagepub.com/home/evj
Corrigenda
Boyce, A.S. (2019). Introduction to Section on Values in Evaluation Praxis. Evaluation
Journal of Australasia, 19, 195-198. DOI: 10.1177/1035719X19892526
In this article there are two places where the passage toward the end of page 196
should refer to cost-benefit analysis instead of value for money.
On page 196, Statements:
In the fourth article, ‘Economic Methods Used in Service to Evaluation’, King
discusses strategies for how evaluators can use economic methods, specifically
Value for Money (VFM) within their evaluations. While the author describes how
VFM assessment supports accountability, reflection, learning, and improvement,
he also encourages evaluators to select contextually appropriate methods, which
could ultimately exclude VFM and other economic methods.
This should read as:
In the fourth article, ‘Economic Methods Used in Service to Evaluation’, King
discusses strategies for how evaluators can use economic methods, specifically
cost-benefit analysis (CBA) within their evaluations. While the author describes
how value for money (VFM) assessment supports accountability, reflection,
learning, and improvement, he also encourages evaluators to select contextually
appropriate methods, which could ultimately exclude CBA and other economic
methods.
King, J. (2019). Combining multiple approaches to valuing in the MUVA female eco-
nomic empowerment program. Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 19, 217-225. DOI:
10.1177/1035719X19893080
In this article on page 222, there is a clarification to the first sentence:
Evaluative reasoning (Fournier, 1995; Scriven, 1980, 1994, 1995, 2012) is central to
making valid judgements about whether and how to use VFM.
This should read as: Evaluative reasoning (Fournier, 1995; Scriven, 1980, 1994,
1995, 2012) is central to making judgements about whether a policy or programme
provides VFM.
939327EVJ0010.1177/1035719X20939327
correction2020
To continue reading
Request your trial