Crake v Supplementary Benefits Commission; Butterworth v Supplementary Benefits Commission

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1981
Date1981
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
42 cases
  • Amicus Horizon Ltd v The Estate of Miss Judy Mabbott (Deceased) and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • May 30, 2012
    ...a context, their intentions, as demonstrated by their conduct, are, in my judgment, of great importance." 24 Likewise in Crake v Supplementary Benefits Commission [1982] 1 All R 498 Woolf J (as he then was) observed at page 504: "If the only reason that Mr Jones went to that house temporari......
  • G. v F. (Non-molestation Order: Jurisdiction)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • May 12, 2000
    ...within the meaning of section 62(3)(b). Three of the "admirable signposts" set out in Crake v Supplementary Benefits CommissionUNK ((1982) 1 All ER 498) were present here: a sexual relationship, some financial support, and the respondent's evidence demonstrating that from his perspective th......
  • E v Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • February 2, 2004
    ...the tribunal had never properly considered the matter…and that the proper thought processes have not been gone through' ( Crake v Supplementary Benefits Commission [1982] 1 All ER 498. 508)." In the Guinness case the issue was whether the Tribunal had misunderstood some of the complicated e......
  • R v Suffolk County Council, ex parte Steed and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • November 11, 1996
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT