R v Suffolk County Council, ex parte Steed and Another

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date11 November 1996
Date11 November 1996
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)

Court of Appeal

Regina
and
Suffolk County Council, Ex parte Speed and Another

Common land - failure to register - customary rights not extinguished

Green rights not lost

A failure to register a town green as common land under section 1(2)(a) of the Commons Registration Act 1965 did not have the effect of extinguishing the customary rights over the land. Such land could subsequently still be proved by evidence to be a green although it was not deemed to be a green under the Act as appropriately registered land was.

The Court of Appeal (Lord Justice Butler-Sloss, Lord Justice Pill and Lord Justice Schiemann) so held on July 11 when dismissing, on other grounds, an appeal by David and Colin Steel against a decision of Mr Justice Carnwath in which he dismissed an application to quash a refusal by Suffolk County Council to register land known as the People's Park, Sudbury as a town green.

Court of Appeal

Regina
and
Suffolk County Council, Ex parte Steed and Another

Commons registration - failure to register - customary rights

Deciding green rights

The failure to register a town green under section 1(2)(a) of the Commons Registration Act 1965 did not have the effect of extinguishing any existing customary rights over the land which could be proved in evidence.

The Court of Appeal (Lord Justice Butler-Sloss, Lord Justice Pill and Lord Justice Schiemann) so stated on July 11 in dismissing an appeal by the applicants, David and Colin Steed, against a decision of Mr Justice Carnwath to dismiss their application to quash the refusal of Suffolk County Council to register the Peoples Park, Sudbury as a town green.

LORD JUSTICE PILL said that he had come to that conclusion having regard to the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • R v Oxfordshire County Council, ex parte Sunningwell Parish Council
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 24 June 1999
    ...had not been shown to be "as of right." In coming to this conclusion, he followed the decision of the Court of Appeal in Reg. v. Suffolk County Council, Ex parte Steed (1996) 75 P. & C.R. 102 which held that "as of right" meant that the right must be exercised in the belief that it is a rig......
  • R (Lewis) v Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council and Another (No. 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 3 March 2010
    ...Hoffmann held (and the rest of the Appellate Committee agreed) that this was an error. The decision of the Court of Appeal in R v Suffolk County Council Ex p Steed (1996) 75 P & CR 102 was overruled. That was the context in which Lord Hoffmann stated in a passage (at pp352-353) relied on b......
  • Paddico (267) Ltd v (1) Kirklees Metropolitan Council and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 23 June 2011
    ...in the present case by the fact that the so-called village green is wholly undefined. It has no boundaries even on a plan". 77 In R. v. Suffolk County Council, ex parte Steed and Steed [1995] 70 P. & C.R. 487 (the " Steed case"), Carnwath J rejected an application for judicial review of Suf......
  • Oxfordshire County Council v Oxford City Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 22 January 2004
    ...the appropriate register. The word "may" underlines the fact that registration is optional. In R v. Suffolk CC ex parte Steed ("Steed") (1996) 75 P&CR 102 at 113, Pill LJ held that the meaning of the expression that land "becomes" a Green is that the land "becomes registrable" as a Green. W......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Village and Hundred
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill The Law of the Manor - 2nd Edition Part IV. Setting
    • 29 August 2012
    ...cricket, you have got beyond your custom. 16 In In re Turnworth Down, Dorset [1978] Ch 251 and R v Suffolk County Council, Ex p Steed (1996) 75 P&CR 102. 17 [2006] 2 AC 674 at [17]–[19]. 18 R v Oxfordshire County Council, Ex p Sunningwell Parish Council [2000] 1 AC 335. 19 (1876) 24 WR 603.......
  • Custom and Variety
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill The Law of the Manor - 2nd Edition Part I. Roots
    • 29 August 2012
    ...of those cases may have involved a franchise. 71 In re Turnworth Down, Dorset [1978] Ch 251; R v Suffolk County Council, Ex p Steed (1996) 75 P&CR 102. 72 [2006] 2 AC 674 at [17]–[19]. (19.7). All greens therefore now depend on registration, and the former customary rights must therefore ha......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Planning Law. A Practitioner's Handbook Contents
    • 30 August 2019
    ...76 (Admin), [2002] 2 PLR 1, [2002] ACD 63, [2002] NPC 26, QBD 500, 501 R v Suffolk County Council ex parte Steed [1995] 75 P & CR 102, [1997] 1 EGLR 131, [1996] NPC 117, CA 496, 500 R v Surrey County Council ex parte Bridge Court Holdings Ltd [2000] 4 PLR 30, [2000] PLCR 344, (2000) 97(8) L......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill The Law of the Manor - 2nd Edition Preliminary Sections
    • 29 August 2012
    ...Steward and Suitors of the Manor of Havering Atte Bower (1822) 5 B and Ald 691, 106 ER 1343 13.2 R v Suffolk County Council ex p Steed (1996) 75 P & CR 102, [1997] 1 EGLR 131, CA 4.9, 19.7 R v Tower (1815) 4 M&S 162, 105 ER 795, 16 RR 428 25.4 R v Wakeford (1714) Sess 98, 93 ER 100 13.5 R v......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT