Crosdale v The Queen
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1995 |
| Date | 1995 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
56 cases
-
William Penn v The Queen
...be construed as placing pressure on the jury; and the conviction which resulted is not unsafe. McKenna (1960) 44 Cr App R. 68 , Rupert Crosdale v The Queen Privy council App No. 13 of 1994 (Jamaica) delivered 6 th April, 1995, De Four v The State [1999] 1 WLR 1731 distinguished. 6. The E......
- Mitchell v The Queen
-
Black v R
...part of the transcript runs to almost three pages. The jury ought to have been asked to withdraw: see the judgment of the Board in Crosdale v. The Queen [1995] 1 W.L.R. 864, delivered immediately before the judgment in Lobban's case. The procedure adopted was irregular. What was its impact......
- R v Maharaj; and other appeals
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Judge and Jury: Towards a New Division of Labour in Criminal Trials
...Process’ (1994) 14 OJLS 469.49 Bawdon, ‘Who Checks Forensics?’ The Times, 24 May 1996.50 Zuckerman, n 38 above, 40–42; Crosdale vR[1995] 2 All ER 500, 506, per Lord Steyn.51 See eg RvChinn [1996] Crim LR 729 (upholding the judge’s duty to see that prosecution counseltake proper steps to pro......