Darmalingum v Mauritius
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 10 July 2000 |
| Date | 10 July 2000 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
106 cases
-
R v David Omara
...Examples of that alternative are cited in paragraph 25 of Lord Bingham's speech by reference to cases of Darmalingum v The State [2000] 1 WLR 2303 and Martin v Tauranga District Court [1995] 2 NZLR 419. 33 In the light of Attorney General's Reference No 2 of 2001, but also of other authorit......
-
Romeo Cannonier Appellant v DPP Respondent [ECSC]
...that citizens are afforded their guaranteed rights and protection. (per Mitchell J.A. [Ag.]) Sooriamurthy Darmalingum v The State [2000] 1 W.L.R. 2303 applied; De Freitas v Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, Lands and Housing and Others [1999] 1 A.C. 69 applied.......
-
Romeo Cannonier Appellant v DPP Respondent [ECSC]
...that citizens are afforded their guaranteed rights and protection. (per Mitchell J.A. [Ag.]) Sooriamurthy Darmalingum v The State [2000] 1 W.L.R. 2303 applied; De Freitas v Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, Lands and Housing and Others [1999] 1 A.C. 69 applied.......
- Porter v Magill
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Due Process and Dirty Harry Dilemmas: Criminal Appeals and the Human Rights Act
...theirremediable breaches of constitutional rights, in cases such as Allie Mohammed vThe State [1999] 2AC 111, Darmalingum vThe State [2000] 2 Cr App R 445.38 n 31 above.39 As the Human Rights Act 1998 was not yet in force, the Court of Appeal was technically free todisregard the judgment of......