Dollar v Greenfield
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 18 May 1905 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1905] UKHL J0518-1 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 18 May 1905 |
[1905] UKHL J0518-1
House of Lords
After hearing Counsel, as well on Monday and Tuesday last as this day, upon the Petition and Appeal of Peter Salmon Dollar, of 512 Oxford Street, in the County of London, jobmaster, praying, That the matter of the Order set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Order of His Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 23d of March 1904, might be reviewed before His Majesty the King in His Court of Parliament, and that the said Order might be reversed, varied, or altered, and that the Judgment of the High Court, dated the 29th day of June 1903, entered pursuant to the Order of the Honourable Mr. Justice Grantham, thereby Reversed, might be restored, or that the Petitioner might have such other relief in the premises as to his Majesty the King in His Court of Parliament might seem meet; as also upon the printed case of William Bunce Greenfield, lodged in answer to the said Appeal; and due consideration had of what was offered on either side in this Cause:
It is Ordered and Adjudged, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in the Court of Parliament of His Majesty the King assembled, That the said Order of His Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 23d day of March 1904, complained of in the said Appeal, be, and the same is hereby, Reversed; and that the Judgment of the Honourable Mr. Justice Grantham, of the 29th day of June 1903, thereby set aside, be, and the same is hereby, Restored: And it is further Ordered, That the Respondent do pay, or cause to be paid, to the said Appellant the costs incurred by him in the Courts below, and also the costs...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Volcafe Ltd and Others v Compania Sud Americana de Vapores SA (t/a CSAV)
...of ordinary care.” The law was declared in this sense and applied to carriage by water by the House of Lords in Dollar v Greenfield, The Times, 19 May 1905, and Morison, Pollexfen & Blair v Walton (10 May 1909), which is unreported but the relevant parts of which were set out and adopted by......
-
Travers (Joseph) & Sons Ltd v Cooper
...to show that the negligence did not cause the loss: Phipps v. New Claridge'e Hotel, 22 Times L. Rep. 49; Dollar v. Greenfield, Times, May 19, 1905; Scott v. London and St. Kathtrine'n Docks Company, 13 L. T. Bap. 148; 3 H. & C. 596. Here the defendant has not shown that the negligence did n......
-
Canadian National Railway Co. v. Hammill, (1973) 5 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 340 (PEISC)
...their part. He stated, at p. 315, that an authoritative statement of the law was to be found in the case of Dollar v. Greenfield, 'The Times', May 19, 1905, p. 3 (followed in Pratt v. Waddington, 23, O.L.R. 178). Dollar v. Greenfield was a case of a bailment of a horse for hire. It broke aw......