DPP v Billington
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1988 |
| Year | 1988 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
23 cases
- DPP v Noe
-
Chalupa v Crown Prosecution Service
...1.11 Before considering the submissions in the case, I will deal with some of the more important authorities chronologically. In DPP vs Billington [1988]1 WLR 535, Lord Justice Lloyd, with whom Mr Justice Mann agreed, giving judgment in the Divisional court, made it plain that neither the l......
-
DPP v Ward
...the evidence of the breath specimen under section 78 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. It was clear from DPP v BillingtonUNK ([1988] RTR 231) that the right to consult a solicitor, under section 58 of the 1984 Act, did not apply when a motorist was required to provide a specimen......
- DPP v Skinner
Request a trial to view additional results
9 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
.......................... Bielecki v DPP [2011] EWHC 2245 (Admin), [2012] Crim LR 785! 80 Billington, DPP v; Chappell v DPP; DPP v Rumble, [1988] 1 WLR 535, ! [1988] 1 All ER 435, [1988] RTR 231, [1987] Crim LR 772, ...................................................................................
-
Reasonable Excuse
...cases under the heading “Legal Advice” in Chapter 8, page 364 et seq. DPP v Billington; Chappell v DPP; DPP v Rumble; Corywright v East [1988] 1 WLR 535, [1988] 1 All ER 435, [1988] RTR 231, [1987] Crim LR 772, 20 July 1987, QBD (DC) The procedure for taking breath specimens for analysis is......
-
Wielding a "very long, people-intensive spear": inherently governmental functions and the role of contractors in U.S. Department of Defense unmanned aircraft systems missions.
...(3) and (12). (151) OFPP Policy Letter 11-1, supra note 127, at Appendix A. "Examples of inherently governmental functions," (4) and (5). (152) JP 1-02, supra note 8 (The dictionary's purpose is to assist communications within and between the Services, other agencies, and U.S. allies by sup......
-
Divisional Court
...and, because of the lack of this 'safeguard' for so young adefendant, to dismiss the information.316 Divisional CourtInDPPv Billington[1988]RTR 231, the court considered therelationship between ss 7 and 8 of the Road Traffic Act 1988, giving thedriver an option of substituting a specimen of......
Request a trial to view additional results