Easybiz Investments v Sinograin (The Biz)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date2010
Neutral Citation[2010] EWHC 2565 (Comm)
Date2010
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • Empyreal Energy Ltd v Daylighting Power Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 22 Julio 2020
    ...to operate: see Lord Steyn at 767G-H, 768G-H. Many other statements of principle to like effect could be cited including Easybiz Investments v Sinograin (The Biz) [2010] EWHC 2565 (Comm) at 11 per Hamblen J, a decision on s. 14(4) of the Arbitration Act 1996 which provides a timely reminde......
  • LLC Agronefteprodukt v Ameropa AG
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 21 Diciembre 2021
    ...Plovidba v Consignaciones Asturianas SA [2004] 2 Lloyd's Rep 109 at [17], Moore-Bick J. Applying these authorities, in The Biz [2011] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 688 at [11], Hamblen J set out the principles as follows: “(1) When asking whether the requirements of section 14 have been complied with, o......
  • Viscous Global Investment Ltd v Palladium Navigation Corporation
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 30 Julio 2014
    ...Procedure does not apply. I would not regard this construction as being inconsistent with the decision of Hamblen J in The Biz [2010] EWHC 2565 (Comm), [2011] 1 Lloyd's Rep 688. That case was not concerned with the construction of an arbitration clause in an LOU but with the appointment of ......
  • A v B
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 21 Diciembre 2017
    ... ... Ltd [ 2006 ] EWHC 2707 (Comm); [ 2007 ] 1 All ER (Comm) 527 Easybiz Investments v Sinograin (The Biz) [ 2010 ] EWHC 2565 (Comm); [ 2011 ] 1 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Separate Requests essential in multi-contract LCIA arbitrations
    • United Kingdom
    • JD Supra United Kingdom
    • 15 Febrero 2018
    ...to Article 22(x) on the basis that a claimant should not be permitted to bypass the need for the tribunal's consolidation order. 2 [2011] 1 Lloyd's Rep 688. 3 AIG Europe (Ireland) Ltd. v Faraday Capital Ltd [2006] 2 CLC 770, involving the interpretation of a notification clause in a reinsur......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT