George Tan Soon Gin v Judge Cameron and Another
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 16 July 1992 |
| Date | 16 July 1992 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
121 cases
-
Gibbs, Commissioner of Police v Attorney-General et Al
... ... into drug trafficking — Issue of search warrants by judge of Grand Court raises rebuttable presumption of regularity ... interest and upon two safety deposit boxes held by another bank. A comment made to him while he was in Amsterdam ... [1989] S.T.C. at 532 ) and ( Gin v. Cameron [1992] 2 A.C. at 225 ). The preferable approach is to ... ...
-
Heron (Michael) v DPP and Attorney General for Jamaica
...but that here the position is different: only one jury was unable to reach a verdict." 80Lord Slynn continued thus at page 460: "In Tan Soon Gin v Cameron [1992] 2 AC 205 the Board, however, indicated a broader approach. In the speech delivered by Lord Mustill, their Lordships said (at pag......
-
Porter v Magill
... ... 6 Very soon after the 1986 local government elections, the first ... ...
-
Deutsche Bank AG v Sebastian Holdings Inc.
...without delay. 158 The proper approach to the exercise of this exceptional jurisdiction is explained by Lord Mustill in Tan v. Cameron [1992] 2 A.C. 205, 225. The question is: “whether, in all the circumstances, the situation created by the delay is such as to make it an unfair employment o......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Destroyed or Lost Evidence and Abuse of Process
...19 (WLR), per LordLaneCJ,adoptingHeston-Francois(1984)1 All ER 785, 793(CA).This is quotedwithapproval inTanvCameron[1992] 2 AC205, 223-4(PC).14 The CanadianCharterof RightsandFreedoms, Part IoftheConstitutionAct 1982, beingSchedule BtotheCanada Act 1982 (UK),1982, c. 11, [hereinaftertheCha......