Goldsack v Shore

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1950
Date1950
Year1950
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
25 cases
  • Verrall v Farnes
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
  • Duek ak Atin v Rick Ventures Sdn Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2013
  • London Borough of Southwark v Ludgate House Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 4 December 2020
    ...at will endures, the tenant at will has exclusive possession of the land comprised in the tenancy: Lynes v Snaith [1899] 1 QB 486; Goldsack v Shore [1950] 1 KB 708. We are concerned with the anterior question: whether under the terms of occupation a guardian was entitled to exclusive occu......
  • Holder v Holder
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 8 December 1967
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Interpretation Of Statutes
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon's Laws of Nigeria. Volume 12 Interpretation Of Statutes
    • 3 July 2016
    ...must not be excluded unless there is clear language in the statute which is alleged to have that effect (see Goldsack v. Shore (1950) 1 All E.R. 276, 277 per Evershed, M.R.” - Per Obaseki, J.S.C. in Salami v . Chairman L.E.D.B. & Ors. & Ors. Suit No. S.C. 226/1985; (1989) 20 N.S.C.C. (Pt. I......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT