Grady v Pollard
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1988 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
- Smith (Nicholas) v DPP (Note)
-
DPP v Pearman
...evidence. His Lordship was unwilling to accept the proposition in those absolute terms. Lord Justice Glidewell in Grady v PollardUNK ([1988] RTR 316, 323) had said: "Such evidence will normally be the evidence of a medical practitioner, but it need not be, and one can envisage situations in......
- DPP v Falzarano
-
DPP v Ian William Simpson
...medical ground for his failure to provide a specimen then this should be supported by evidence preferably from a doctor — Grady v Pollard 1988 RTR 316." 4 The Justices found that Mr Simpson was truthful in his evidence to the court. They considered his evidence in great detail, as one posit......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...AC 646, [1993] 2 WLR 883, [1993] 2 All ER 724, HL! 579 ............................................................ Grady v Pollard [1988] RTR 316, DC! 244 , 252 .................................................................... Graham v Albert [1985] RTR 352, DC! 20 ...........................
-
Reasonable Excuse
...5: REASONABLE EXCUSE 4. “Trying Hard” See also DPP v Coyle, page 256 – “doing one’s best” is not a reasonable excuse. Grady v Pollard [1988] RTR 316, 3 February 1988, QBD (DC) Evidence that the defendant had tried as hard as he could, unsuccessfully, to provide a breath specimen was not of ......