Grant v Australian Knitting Mills Ltd

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1935
Date1935
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
244 cases
  • Marc Rich & Company A.G. v Bishop Rock Marine Company Ltd (Nicholas H)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 3 February 1994
    ...StevensonELR [1932] AC 562. Gran Gelato Ltd v Richcliff (Group) Ltd & OrsELR [1992] Ch 560. Grant v Australian Knitting Mills Ltd & OrsELR [1936] AC 85. Haseldine v C A Daw & Son Ltd [l94l] 2 KB 343. Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners LtdELR [1964] AC 465. Hill v Chief Constable of W......
  • Bethune v Qconn Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Hardwick Game Farm v Suffolk Agricultural Poultry Producers Association
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 20 December 1965
    ...v. Rea (1922 2 Appeal Cases page 74), Cammell Laird & Co. v. Manganese Bronze & Brass Co. (1934 Appeal Cases page 402) and Grant Australian Knitting Mills (1936 Appeal Cases page 85) as containing expressions of view appropriate and applicable to the facts and circumstances of the present c......
  • Chester v Waverley Corporation
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
14 books & journal articles
  • Litigation
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume III - Third Edition
    • 13 April 2020
    ...Seaquest Enterprise Pte Ltd v Agile Accomm Pte Ltd [2016] SGHC 51 at [29], per Edmud Leow JC. 984 See Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1936] AC 85 at 98 (PC). 985 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 at 361–362, per Dixon J. See also Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) section 140; Ballard v Mul......
  • Defects
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume II - Third Edition
    • 13 April 2020
    ...Pte Ltd v Iwatani Techno Construction (M) Sdn Bhd [2000] SGHC 37 at [97], per Chan Seng Onn JC. 162 Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1936] AC 85 at 105 (PC); Henry Kendall & Sons v William Lillico & Sons Ltd [1969] 2 AC 31 at 75, per Lord Reid; Rotherham MBC v Frank Haslam & Co Ltd (1996)......
  • The emergence of solicitors’ tortious liability and the award of damages
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Financial Crime No. 10-4, October 2003
    • 1 October 2003
    ...underpants and suer injury as the consu-mers respectively did in Donoghue v Stevenson[1932] AC 562 and Grant v Australian KnittingMills [1936] AC 85. He did not act to his ®nancialdetriment, relying upon the professional skill of thebankers or upon any advice given to him by thebankers as ......
  • The Australian High Court and Social Facts: A Content Analysis Study
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 40-3, September 2012
    • 1 September 2012
    ...Values (Federation Press, 2011) 93. 4 (1933) 50 CLR 387. The Privy Council appeal is reported at Grant v Australian Knitting Mills Ltd (1935) 54 CLR 49. 5 Australian Knitting Mills Ltd v Grant (1933) 50 CLR 387, 409. 6 Ibid 410. 7 (1939) 62 CLR 1. 8 Ibid 10. This SF appears to be based on j......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT