Grimoldby v Wells

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1865
Date1865
CourtDivisional Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Huyton S.A. v Peter Cremer G.m.b.H. & Company
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • Invalid date
  • Atari Corporation (UK) Ltd v The Electronics Boutique Stores (UK) Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 15 July 1997
    ...sale goods for breach of condition, it must indicate that the buyer "want[s] and will have nothing more to do with the goods". See also Grimoldby v. Wells [1875] LR 10 CP 391 in which it was held that rejection of goods for non-conformance with sample may be by notice, providing it unequivo......
  • Huyton SA v Peter Cremer GmbH & Company [QBD (Comm)]
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 21 October 1998
    ...Co Ltd (“The Delfini”)UNK [1990] 1 Ll Rep 252. Ginzberg v Barrow Haematite Steel Co LtdUNK [1966] 1 Ll Rep 343. Grimoldby v WellsELR (1875) LR 10 CP 391. Kwei Tek Chao v British Traders & Shippers LtdELR [1954] 2 QB 459. Maskell v HornerELR [1915] 3 KB 106. Napier (FE) v Dexters LtdUNK (192......
  • Huyton S.A. v Peter Cremer G.m.b.H. & Company
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 21 October 1998
    ...are not accepted and at the risk of the vendor": see Benjamin's Sale of Goods (Fifth Ed.) para. 12–032, citing Grimoldby v. Wells (1875) L.R. 10 C.P. 391. That was a case on rejection of goods sold by sample which were found after delivery not to be equal to the sample. The issue in such a ......
1 books & journal articles
  • Sale or Return Contracts: Shedding a Little Light
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 61-3, May 1998
    • 1 May 1998
    ...See Felthouse vBindley (1862) 11 CBNS 869.9Vargas Pena Apezteguia Y CIA vCremer [1987] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 394, 398. Also, Grimoldby vWells[1875] LR 10 CP 391.10 [1997] AC 749.11 In that case, a lessee, wishing to determine leases under a break clause which required at least sixmonths notice to b......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT