Guardian News and Media Ltd and Others v Incedal and Another

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date24 September 2014
Date24 September 2014
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)

Court of Appeal

Before Lord Justice Gross, Mr Justice Simon and Mr Justice Burnett

Guardian News and Media Ltd and Others
and
Incedal and Another
Open Justice in criminal trials

When there were compelling reasons for a criminal trial to be held in camera everything possible would be been done to minimise the departure from the principle of open justice including allowing journalists to attend the trial subject to terms of confidentiality.

The Court of Appeal, Criminal Division so stated when giving reasons for allowing an appeal by Guardian News and Media Ltd, Associated Newspapers Ltd, the BBC, BSKYB Ltd, Express Newspapers, Independent Print Ltd, ITN, Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd, News Group Newspapers Ltd, Telegraph Media Grou p, Times Newspapers Ltd and the Press Association on June 12, 2014TLR (The Times June 18, 2014) against the order of Mr Justice Nicol made on May 19, 2014, in which he ruled that: (1) the criminal trial of Erol Incedal and Mounir Rarmoul-Bouhadjar on terrorism charges would be held in private and publication of reports prohibited; (2) the names and identities of the defendants would be withheld and unpublished; and (3) the publication of reports of the open court part of the hearing and open judgment be postponed until the conclusion of the trial or further order.

Mr Anthony Hudson and Mr Ben Silverstone for the appellants; Mr Henry Blaxland, QC and Mr Richard Thomas for the first defendant; Mr Naeem Mian for the second defendant; Mr Richard Whittam, QC and Mr Stuart Baker for the Crown.

LORD JUSTICE GROSS, giving the reserved judgment of the court, said that the case was exceptional. The court was persuaded on the evidence before it that there was a significant risk, at the very least, a serious possibility, that the administration of justice would be frustrated wer e the trial to be conducted in open court. For good reason on the material the court had seen, the Crown might be deterred from continuing with the prosecution. Indeed, on all the material, the case for the core of the trial to be heard in camera was compelling and the court acceded to it.

There would be no risk to the administration of justice, however, if the following elements of the trial were heard in open court (1) swearing in of the jury; (2) reading charges to the jury; (3) part of the judge's introductory remarks to the jury; (4) part of the prosecution opening; (5) the verd icts; (6) sentencing if any convictions resulted, subject to any further agreement...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Re Guardian News and Media Ltd and Others (No 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 9 February 2016
    ...entire criminal trial should be held in camera. The media organisations appealed against that ruling and the Court of AppealTLRUNK (The Times October 29, 2014; [2015] 1 Cr App R 36) varied the judge's order to allow the defendants to be named and to allo w limited parts of the trial to be d......
3 books & journal articles
  • CLASS ACTION SQUARED: MULTISTATE ACTIONS AND AGENCY DILEMMAS.
    • United States
    • Notre Dame Law Review Vol. 96 No. 1, November 2020
    • 1 November 2020
    ...for insubstantial contributions to victims."). (218) See Eric Lipton, Lobbyists, Bearing Gifts, Pursue Attorneys General, N.Y. TIMES, Oct. 29, 2014, at (219) Id.; see Lemos, Aggregate Litigation, supra note 9, at 514-16. (220) See Lemos, Aggregate Litigation, supra note 9, at 515-16. (221) ......
  • The new front in the clean air wars: fossil-fuel influence over state attorneys general - and how it might be checked.
    • United States
    • Michigan Law Review Vol. 115 No. 6, April 2017
    • 1 April 2017
    ...supra note 4. (63.) See id. (64.) See id. (65.) See id. (66.) Eric Lipton, Lobbyists, Bearing Gifts, Pursue Attorneys General, N.Y. Times, Oct. 29, 2014, at A1. (67.) Id. (68.) Id. at A18; Pam Bondi and Dickstein: A Mutually Beneficial Relationship, N.Y. Times, at 55 (Oct. 28, 2014), http:/......
  • Carbon Pricing
    • United States
    • Legal pathways to deep decarbonization in the United States Part II - Cross-Cutting Approaches to Reducing Emissions
    • 24 March 2019
    ...September 29, 2014, D.O., I-39 (Chile); Kate Galbraith, Climate Change Concerns Push Chile to Forefront of Carbon Tax Movement , N.Y. Times, Oct. 29, 2014, https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/30/business/ international/climate-change-concerns-push-chile-to-forefront-of-carbon-tax-movement.html.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT