Hampton v Lord Chancellor
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Year | 2008 |
| Date | 2008 |
| Court | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Donnellan v Min for Justice and Others
...1) [1992] 16 CHR 409; Bartsch v Bosch Und Siemens Hausgerate (Bsh) Alteredsfursorge Gmbh [2009] All ER 113; Hampton v Lord Chancellor [2008] IRLR 258; 16 Pilots v Martinair Holland Nv & Vereniging van Nederlandse Verkeersvliegers (Nr C03/077HR); Massachusetts Board of Retirement v Murgia (1......
-
Mr S Tilley and others v Egyptair Airlines Company: 2207205/2018 and 2201502/2019
...to the policy and the availability of pensions were legitimate considerations. 165. On proportionality, in Hampton v Lord Chancellor 2008 IRLR 258 the ET held that a mandatory retirement age of 65 years for Recorders was not a proportionate means of achieving the legitimate aim of obtaining......
-
Case Number: ADJ-00011134. Workplace Relations Commission
...In conclusions, the complainant opened case law relating to a retirement age (Hampton v Lord Chancellor of the Administrator of Justice [2008] IRLR 258). He relied on Moore Walsh v Waterford Institute of Technology (DEC-E2016-153) where the applicant had previous difficulties with a person ......
-
Mr E Carrieles v North Tyneside Council: 2500191/2021
...falls within the band, the dismissal is fair. If the dismissal falls outside the band it is unfair. 5. The case of Igen Limited v Wong [2008] IRLR 258 where the court of appeal held there is a two stage process in complaints of discrimination but the Tribunal should not divide hearings into......
Request a trial to view additional results