Henry Boot v Malmaison

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1999
Year1999
Date1999
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
21 cases
  • Daya CMT Sdn Bhd v Yuk Tung Construction Sdn Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • January 1, 2018
  • North Range Shipping Ltd v Seatrans Shipping Corpn
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • March 26, 2002
    ...Arbitration Act 1996, and the decisions of this court in Aden Refinery Co v Ugland Management Co Ltd [1987] QB 650 and Henry Boot Construction v Malmaison Hotel Ltd [2001] QB 388? 3 I would just add, with regard to these last two points, that I for my part do not think that this court could......
  • Athletic Union of Constantinople v National Basketball Association
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • May 28, 2002
    ...to grant permission itself or to review a refusal of the High Court or county court to grant permission: (see Henry Boot Construction (UK) Ltd v Malmaison Hotel (Manchester) Ltd [2001] 1 QB 308). Much of the reasoning of Waller LJ, who gave the leading judgment in that case, can be applied ......
  • Henry Boot v Malmaison
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • July 28, 2000
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 firm's commentaries
  • Construction Arbitration: Ireland
    • Ireland
    • Mondaq Ireland
    • August 19, 2022
    ...in England. Irish law tends to follow the precedent set down in Henry Boot Construction (UK) Ltd v Malmaison Hotel (Manchester) Ltd [1999] 70 Con LR 32regarding concurrency of delay, If there are two concurrent causes of delay, one of which is a relevant event, and the other is not, then th......
  • TCC Issues New Decision Addressing The Definition Of Concurrent Delay
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • October 31, 2022
    ...an extension of time against an Owner. In the seminal case, Henry Boot Construction (UK) Ltd v Malmaison Hotel (Manchester) Ltd [1999] 70 Con. L.R. 32, the Court recognized that in such a situation the Contractor would be entitled to an extension of time but not to prolongation The determin......
  • Projects & Construction Law Update - October 2017
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • November 16, 2017
    ...referred to as the Malmaison approach (following the 1999 case of Henry Boot Construction (UK) Ltd v Malmaison Hotel (Manchester) Ltd (1999) 70 Con LR 32) and was confirmed in the 2012 case of Walter Lilly & Company Ltd v Giles Patrick Cyril Mackay and another [2012] EWHC 1773 However, ......
  • The Saga Decision: Concurrent Delay And Causation
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • March 27, 2017
    ...Law UK paper "Concurrent Delay" (February 2002), p 2. 3 Henry Boot Construction (UK) Ltd v Malmaison Hotel (Manchester) Ltd [1999] 70 Con LR 32. 4 Adyard Abu Dhabi and SD Marine Services [2011] EWHC 848 5 Balfour Beatty v Chestermount Properties (1993) 62 BLR 1. The content of this article ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT