Hodgkinson & Corby Ltd v Wards Mobility Services Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1994 |
| Year | 1994 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
47 cases
-
Oceanbulk Shipping and Trading SA v TMT Asia Ltd and Others
...to act and does in fact act may be admissible as giving rise to an estoppel. That was the view of Neuberger J in Hodgkinson & Corby Ltd v Wards Mobility Services Ltd [1997] FSR 178, 191 and his view on that point was not disapproved by this court on appeal.” It is worth remarking that the ......
-
Numatic International Ltd v Qualtex UK Ltd
...source. The claimant must prove that the shape of its goods has come to denote a particular source to the relevant public: see Hodgkinson & Corby v Wards Mobility [1994] 1 WLR 1564 per Jacob J at 1573–4. In that case Jacob J asked whether: "the plaintiffs have proved that the shape of thei......
-
Robyn Rihanna Fenty and Others v Arcadia Group Brands Ltd (t/a Topshop) and Another
...about trade origin. Mr Hobbs rightly referred me to the words of Jacob J (as he then was) in Hodgkinson v Wards Mobility [1995] FSR 169 and of the Court of Appeal in Harrods v Harrodian School [1996] RPC 697 about the significance of deception in passing off. Jacob J emphasised that the tor......
-
Brown (Tim) (as trustee in bankruptcy of the estate of Jane Elizabeth Rice) v (1) Rice (Stephen) (2) Patel (Smita); and ADR Group (as intervener)
...to the negotiations and on which the other party is intended to and does in fact act may give rise to an estoppel, see Hodgkinson and Corby v Wards Mobility Services [1997] FSR 178, 191 per Neuberger J. On Hoffmann LJ's analysis in Muller, the public policy aspect of the without prejudice r......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Exceptions To The Without Prejudice Rule: When Can Without Prejudice Communications Be Put Before The English Court?
...https://www.mayerbrown.com/en/perspectives-events/publications/2020/05/when-is-a-statement-made-without-prejudice-not-without-prejudice 6 [1997] FSR 178 7 [1996] PNLR 74 at 79-80 8 [2009] UKHL 16 9 [2020] EWHC 1015 (Ch) at paragraph 71 10 [2017] EWHC 1014 (Ch) 11 [2019] EWHC 102 (Ch) 12 [20......
6 books & journal articles
-
Popular Names Index to UK Cases and EU Legislation and Cases
...road transport activities (OJ 2002 L80/35) Robin Hood Case Standard Camera Company Ltd’s Application for a Trade Mark (1952) 69 RPC 125 ROHO Case Hodgkinson & Corby Ltd v Wards Mobility Services Ltd [1995] FSR 169 RoHS Directive See Lead-Free Directive Romalpa Case Aluminium Industrie V......
-
THE SENSE AND SENSIBILITY IN THE ANTI-DILUTION RIGHT
...35The Mogul Steamship Co Ltd v McGregor Gow & Co(1889) 23 QBD 598 at 625–626. 36Hodgkinson Corby Ltd v Wards Mobility Services Ltd[1995] FSR 169 at 173. 37 Art 5(2) of the First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade m......
-
Prior Use as a Ground of Opposition in South African Trade Mark Law
...treated on the same footing.”126 [1962] RPC 265.127 289 li ne 39. 128 Pass ing Off (1994) 46.129 [1990] RPC 341.130 See 416 line 52.131 [1995] FSR 169.132 An a spect not always appr eciated in South Af rica.133 La w of Trade Marks. © Juta and Company (Pty) PRIOR USE AS A GROUND OF OPPOSITIO......
-
Intellectual Property Law
...as to the origin or nature of his goods. As Jacob J (as he then was) emphasised in Hodgkinson & Corby Ltd v Wards Mobility Services Ltd[1995] FSR 169 at 175: At the heart of passing off lies deception or its likelihood, deception of the ultimate consumer in particular. … The foundation of t......
Request a trial to view additional results