Huggett v Miers
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1908 |
| Date | 1908 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
Liverpool City Council v Irwin
...primaeval separation of darkness from light and if he passes during the former must bring his own illumination. I think that the case of Huggett v. Miers [1908] 2 K.B. 278 was decided on this principle and possibly also Devine v. London Housing Society Ltd. [1950] 2 All E.R. 1173. But the......
-
Liverpool City Council v Irwin
...his tenant to the tenant's visitor. The plaintiff thus recovered damages for his personal injury. 54 Fifteen years later this Court in Huggett v. Mires (1908) 2 K.B. 278, again a personal injury case, had to consider Miller v. Hancock. They distinguished the earlier decision on the facts. B......
-
Sleafer v Lambeth Borough Council, C.A.
...to the extent to which that case still survives. He referred us to such cases as Hargroves & Co. V. Hartopp, 1905, 1 King's Bench, 472, Huggett V. Miers, 1908, 2 Kings Bench page 278, Lucy V. Bawden 1914, 2 Kings Bench page 318, Dunster V. Hollis, 1918 2 Kings Bench page 795, and Cockburn ......
-
Fairman v Perpetual Investment Building Society
...its application is illustrated by the case of Cavalier v. Pope (1906, Appeal Cases, p. 428). 12The next authority in order of date is Huggett v. Myers (1908, 2 K.B., p. 278). The circumstances there were similar to those in Miller and Hancock, excepting that the accident was due to the sta......
Request a trial to view additional results