Hutchinson v Hutchinson
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1947 |
| Date | 1947 |
| Court | King's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
Halden v Halden
...4 Accepting that the clause is still there and there is no duty to cohabit, nevertheless it is plain from my own decision in Hutchinson v. Hutchinson, as long ago as 1947, 2 All England Reports, p. 792, that it is no ground for saying that the wife cannot be protected in the home. In that ......
-
National Provincial Bank Ltd v Hastings Car Mart Ltd
... ... its discretion to make an order in relation to property since the subsistence of the marriage he is sufficient to confer jurisdiction: Hutchinson v. Hutchinson. F194 Questions have arisen in considering the extent of the discretion of the court under section 17 of the Act of 1882, but broadly ... ...
-
National Provincial Bank Ltd v Hastings Car Mart Ltd
...Women's Property Act, 1882; and under that Section the Court had a discretion whether to order her out or not: see H v. H, (1947) 63 Times Law Reports, 645; Stewart v. Stewart, 1948 1 King's Bench at page 513, by Lord Justice Tucker. Those procedural grounds have now disappeared; for, by t......
-
National Provincial Bank Ltd v Ainsworth (A.P.).
...discretion to make an order in relation to property since the subsistence of the marriage tie is sufficient to confer jurisdiction. Hutchinson v. Hutchinson [1947] 2 All E.R. 792. Questions have arisen in considering the extent of the discretion of the Court under section 17 of the Act of ......
Request a trial to view additional results