Illidge v Goodwin

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date22 December 1831
Date22 December 1831
CourtHigh Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
11 cases
  • Gayler and Pope Ltd v Davies & Son
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
  • Southport Corporation v Esso Petroleum Company Ltd (Inverpool.)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • December 12, 1955
  • Sullivan v Creed
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • November 20, 1904
    ...S. 198; 1 Stark. 287. (1) 1 Q. B. D. 35. (1) 4 H. & C. 388. (2) 3 Q. B. D. at p. 339. (3) 10 Times L. R. 41. (4) 4 Times L. R. 324. (1) 5 Car. & P. 190. (2) 1 Q. B. (3) [1897] 1 Q. B. 240. (4) 3 Q. B. D. 327. (5) [1897] 2 I. R. 301, 313. (6) [1903] 1 K. B. 331. (7) L. R. 7 C. P. 253. (8) 5 ......
  • Haynes v Harwood
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • Invalid date
    ... ... There are numerous cases. There is the case that Lopes L.J. referred to before Tindal C.J. [ Illidge v. Goodwin F15 ] and Lynch v. Nurdin F16 , which was tried before Williams J., whose decision, that it was a proper case to leave to a jury, was ... ...
  • Get Started for Free