In the Estate of Fuld, deceased (No 4)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1967 |
| Year | 1967 |
| Court | Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
18 cases
-
Candey Ltd v Russell Crumpler and Christopher Farmer (as Joint Liquidators of Peak Hotels & Resorts Ltd ((in Liquidation)))
...SCB Monies were in the bank account but the London Litigation had not yet settled. He relies on the decision of Scarman J in Re Fuld decd [1968] P 727 as establishing that the lien only becomes a security interest when there are ‘funds in sight’. In Re Fuld a litigant in person who had prev......
-
Fairfold Properties Ltd v Exmouth Docks Company Ltd (No 2)
...in terms which were as apt to cover a situation where there had been no taxation of costs as had there been. 4 In Re Fuld (No 4)ELR ([1968] P 727) Mr Justice Scarman had rejected an argument that a solicitor could not have a so called lien on costs which had been ordered to be paid but whic......
-
Clifford Harris & Company v Solland International Ltd and Others
...date is not in evidence) not then been paid over. The jurisdiction can be exercised as soon as there is a 'fund in sight' ( Re Fuld decd [1968] P 727, 736C per Scarman J) and this was undoubtedly the case by July 2004. (v) There is no need for present purposes to distinguish between the ri......
-
Bott & Company Solicitors Ltd v Ryanair Dac
...it is not disputed in this case that the compensation paid by Ryanair is a fund in sight as that concept is discussed in In the Estate of Fuld, decd (No 4) [1968] P (6) The requirement for proceedings 28 Before the end of the nineteenth century it was established that the lien could attach......
Request a trial to view additional results