James Scott MacDonald v HM Advocate
| Jurisdiction | Scotland |
| Neutral Citation | 1997 SCCR 116 |
| Year | 1997 |
| Date | 1997 |
| Court | Unspecified Court (Scotland) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
1 cases
-
Campbell (Thomas) v HM Advocate
...Green v HM AdvocateUNK 1983 SCCR 42 Higgins v HM AdvocateSC 1956 JC 69 McCormack v HM AdvocateSC 1993 JC 170 MacDonald v HM AdvocateUNK 1997 SCCR 116 MacKenzie v HM AdvocateUNK 1995 SCCR 141 Mackie v HM AdvocateSC 1994 JC 132 Maitland v HM Advocate 1993 SLT 645 Mitchell v HM AdvocateUNK 198......
2 books & journal articles
-
Indexes
.... 185Low vHM Advocate 1994SLT 277. . . . . . . . . . . . 23Luca vItaly [2001] ECHR124. . . . . . . . . . . 241, 256MacDonald vHM Advocate 1997SCCR 116 . . . 16MacNeill vWilson 1981 SCCR80 . . . . . . . . . . . . 16Makin v Attorney-General for New South Wales[1894]AC 57 . . . . . . . . . . .......
-
The Corroboration Requirement in Scottish Criminal Trials: Should it Be Retained for Some Forms of Problematic Evidence?
...as driving a vehiclewas corroborated by a witness who saw him checking the vehicle.86 1987 SCCR 558. However, in MacDonald vHM Advocate 1997 SCCR 116, a statement that the accused‘doesn’t look unlike’ the perpetrator could not be treated as a positive identification: ibid. at 119,per Lord J......