Jones v Herxheimer

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1950
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
11 cases
  • Crewe Services and Investment Corporation v Silk
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 2 Diciembre 1998
    ...and Conquest v EbbettsELR ([1896] AC 490, 494). The judge had relied strongly on the Court of Appeal's decision inJones v HerxheimerELR ([1950] 2 KB 106, 116-117) where Lord Justice Jenkins had said: "We find nothing in the earlier authorities to justify the conclusion, as a matter of law, ......
  • Radford v De Froberville
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ... ... 1468 ; [ 1975 ] 3 All E.R. 92 , C.A ... James v. Hutton & J. Cook & Sons Ltd. [ 1950 ] 1 K.B. 9 , C.A ... Jones v. Gooday ( 1841 ) 8 M. & W. 146 ... Joyner v. Weeks [ 1891 ] 2 Q.B. 31 , C.A ... Lesters Leather & Skin Co. Ltd. v. Home & ... The work may already have been done before he sues. Thus, he may have had it done himself as in Jones v. Herxheimer [ 1950 ] 2 K.B. 106 ... Alternatively, he may be able to establish that the work will be done. This, I think, must depend on all the ... ...
  • Tito v Waddell (No. 2); Tito v Attorney General; Ocean Island (No. 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ...1 Sm. & G. 184. Jeune v. Queens Cross Properties Ltd. [1974] Ch. 97; [1973] 3 W.L.R. 378; [1973] 3 All E.R. 97. Jones v. Herxheimer [1950] 2 K.B. 106; [1950] 1 All E.R. 323, C.A. Joyner v. Weeks [1891] 2 Q.B. 31, C.A. Knight Sugar Co. Ltd. v. Alberta Railway & Irrigation Co. [1938] 1 All E.......
  • Nicola McKenzie v Creation Consumer Finance Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division
    • 28 Julio 2023
    ...which had not been carried out, was considered and approved by Arden LJ in Latimer v Carney [2006] EWCA Civ 1417 at para 32, citing Jones v Herxheimer [1950] 2 KB 106. However, I remind myself that I am not to substitute what I might have done for what the judge did. The question for me i......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT