Katherine Elizabeth Kerner (on her own behalf and in a representative capacity for Jack Robert Michael Kerner, a child) v (1) WX (2) YZ (Persons Unknown responsible for pursuing and/or taking photographs of the Claimant and her son at their home on 22 January 2015)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeMr Justice Warby
Judgment Date29 January 2015
Neutral Citation[2015] EWHC 178 (QB)
CourtQueen's Bench Division
Date29 January 2015

[2015] EWHC 178 (QB)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice

Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Before:

Mr Justice Warby

Between:
Katherine Elizabeth Kerner (on her own behalf and in a representative capacity for Jack Robert Michael Kerner, a child)
Claimant
and
(1) WX (2) YZ (Persons Unknown responsible for pursuing and/or taking photographs of the Claimant and her son at their home on 22 January 2015)
Defendants

Tim Lawson-Cruttenden (instructed by Richard Slade and Associates) for the Claimant

The defendants did not appear and were not represented

Hearing date: 29 January 2015

Approved Judgment

I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.

Mr Justice Warby Mr Justice Warby
1

This is the return date of the injunction I granted upon the claimant's application of 22 January 2015, to restrain persons unknown from harassing her and her son. The background and reasons for granting that injunction are set out in the judgment I handed down on of 27 January 2015, [2015] EWHC 128 (QB). The claimant now applies for that injunction to be continued.

2

The claimant has made a further witness statement explaining the steps she has taken since the grant of the injunction, in compliance with undertakings she gave the court, to attempt to identify the defendants. She has given notice of the injunction to three newspaper groups, none of which has responded. She has contacted the DVLA in an attempt to trace the registered keeper of the car driven by one of the defendants, the registration number of which she took during the events complained of. It seems that she will have to wait up to 4 weeks for that information.

3

The claimant confirms that she will serve proceedings if and when she identifies a defendant but at the moment, neither defendant has been served and neither is before the court nor has either made any representations. It is far from clear that the enquiries currently under way will lead to the identification of a defendant. If they do, they may not lead to the identification of both defendants. The claimant states that if she identifies the driver she will seek to obtain from him the identity of the other defendant, but he may not co-operate.

4

In those circumstances I have had to consider how this case should be managed at this stage: what form of order is appropriate at this stage, and what if any steps should be required of the claimant, other than those she has already...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT