Kells v Pilkington
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Year | 2002 |
| Date | 2002 |
| Court | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
City Of Edinburgh Council V. Kamaljit Kaur
...[20] A Tribunal may be entitled to find that discrimination has been established on the basis of inference alone (Kells v Pilkington plc [2002] IRLR 693, Lindsay J at para 22). As the EAT observed in this case (para 17): "the guidance...is really very strong and such as to urge Employment T......
-
Gutridge and Others v Sodexho Ltd
...that it appears not to have been successfully challenged in this Court in over 30 years. The same approach was taken by the EAT in Kells v Pilkington plc [2002] IRLR 693 EAT para 10 per Lindsay P and also in Armstrong & others v Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Trust UKEAT/1058/04 paragraphs 31 and......
-
Mr N Duke v B & M Retail Ltd: 2407320/2021 and 2408357/2021
...2002 EWCA Civ 1686 ( cited in the Respondents' authorities also) Pugh v National Assembly for Wales UKEAT/ O251/06 Kells v Pilkington PLC 2002 IRLR 693 Cast v Croydon College as above Hale v Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust UKEAT/ 0342/16 Matuszowicz v Kingston upon Hull C......
-
Mr R Mumford v Helston Garages Group (Management) Ltd: 1403855/2022
...in terms alleged the existence of a policy, rule or practice and the respondent has not given evidence about it (Kells v Pilkington plc [2002] IRLR 693, EAT, at para 22, per Lindsay Extending time – the ‘not reasonably practicable test 19. The question of whether or not it was reasonably pr......
Request a trial to view additional results