Kevin Stuart v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
Judge | Lord Burrows,Lord Sales,Lord Hamblen,Lord Leggatt,Lord Stephens |
Judgment Date | 15 December 2022 |
Neutral Citation | [2022] UKPC 53 |
Docket Number | Privy Council Appeal No 0067 of 2017 |
Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
18 cases
-
The Attorney General of Jamaica v Shawn Robinson
...or probable cause. The possible presence of malice was not addressed in any detail. In the Privy Council case of Kevin Stewart v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago [2022] UKPC 53, the Board considered the correct test of the state of mind of the police officer against whom a claim for......
-
Andy Toussaint v The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
...malice is a “high hurdle” for the Claimant to pass: Crawford Adjusters para 72a per Lord Wilson. 8 In the decision in Kevin Stuart v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago 2, Lord Burrows said at paragraph 1 that the tort of malicious prosecution contains five elements; “The tort of malici......
-
Matadai Roopnarine v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
...The tort of malicious prosecution 19 As stated in the Board's recent decision in Stuart v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago [2022] UKPC 53, [2023] 4 WLR 21 (“ Stuart”) at para 1: “The tort of malicious prosecution has five elements all of which must be proved on the balance of proba......
-
Ross Russell Jr. v Police Sergeant Richardson Elvin #11449
...Reasonable and probable cause 4 The tort of malicious prosecution contains five elements. In the decision in Kevin Stuart v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago 2, Lord Burrows said at paragraph 1; “ The tort of malicious prosecution has five elements all of which must be proved on the b......
Request a trial to view additional results