Lace v Chantler

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1944
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
49 cases
  • Ashburn Anstalt v Arnold
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
  • Haslam v Money for Living (Aust) Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) (Acn 107 611 218)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Re Midland Railway Company 's Agreement
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 25 January 1971
    ...Judge recited the submission for the Board based on uncertainty of duration, butthereafter did not again notice it; nor did he refer to Lace -v- Chantler (1944 K. B, 368) which was cited in support of the submission. He dealt with a number of authorities on the question of repugnancy, and ......
  • Mexfield Housing Co-Operative Ltd v Berrisford
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 15 July 2010
    ...had been able to be created only by a contract for the exclusive possession of land for a determinate period; (b) at 391 C – G that in Lace v. Chantler [1944] KB 368 this court had rightly held that a lease expressed to be for the duration of the Second World War was invalid; (c) at 394A – ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Property
    • 5 August 2021
    ...595, 67 OR (2d) 135 (SC) ........... 135 Kowbel v Marusiak (1957), 7 DLR (2d) 424, 21 WWR (NS) 35 (Alta CA) ....... 113 Lace v Chandler, [1944] KB 368 (CA).................................................................. 45 Lake v Gibson (1729), 1 Eq Cas Abr 290, 21 ER 1052 .....................
  • Title to Land
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Property
    • 5 August 2021
    ...Co Ltd v London Residuary Body , [1991] UKHL 10, [1992] 2 AC 386. 46 [1996] 5 WWR 516 at 525, 110 Man R (2d) 84 (CA). 47 Ibid. 48 [1944] KB 368 (CA). 49 See, for example, Cottage Holiday Associates Ltd v Customs and Excise Commissioners , [1983] QB 735. 50 [1964] SCR 424, 44 DLR (2d) 673 [c......
  • The Numerus Clausus Principle, Property Customs, and the Emergence of New Property Forms
    • United States
    • Iowa Law Review No. 100-6, August 2015
    • 1 August 2015
    ...Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Kalis, 191 F.2d 739, 739 (8th Cir. 1951); Stanmeyer v. Davis, 53 N.E.2d 22, 24–25 (1944); Lace v. Chantler, [1944] K.B. 368; Merrill & Smith, supra note 2, at 11–12. Occasionally a court will redefine the term of years to allow for such a lease. Smith’s Transfer & Stora......
  • IBADAN CITY COUNCIL & ANOR. AJANAKU
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1969 Cases reported in 1969
    • 12 November 2022
    ...unreasonable, punitive and manifestly excessive; it cannot 10 therefore be disturbed. CASES REFERRED TO IN JUDGMENT. 1. Lace v. Chandler (1944) K.B. 368. 2. Inwards & Others v. Baker (19€5) 2 W.L.R. 212. 15 Chief F.R.A. Williams for Appellant. Yinka Ayoola for Respondent. MADARIKAN, J.S.C. ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT