Lacy v Berry
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1657 |
| Date | 01 January 1657 |
English Reports Citation: 82 E.R. 1308
King's Bench Division
Lacy
and
Berry
lacy versus berry. Challenge. En un tryall al Bar p un jury de Bedfordshire la fuit un challenge al un des jurors, pur ceo q fuit de kin. Et le Chief Justice dit, que quant le challenge que le juror est del sanke le pi' appiert de record ceo est principal challenge, mes quant nest forsq^ p mrns del councel come ore la nest forsque challenge pur cause del favour. Et puis un longe evidence que fuit si le grant del rent charge (ore in quaere) fuit fraudulent le pi' en le repl' (quant les jurors voil aver done lour verdict) esteant call ne...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
2 cases
-
McPhail v Persons, Names Unknown; Bristol Corporation v Ross
...the owner was entitled to take possession at once by his own hand, see Harris v. Austen (1616) 1 Rolls at page 213 by Chief Justice Coke; Lacy v. Berry (1659) 2 Siderfin at page 155/6; Aglionby v. Cohen (1955) 1 Q. B. 14Seeing that the owner could take possession at once without the help of......
-
Aglionby v Cohen
... ... Hemmings v. Stoke Poges Golf Club [1920] 1 K.B. 720; 36 T.L.R. 77 and Lacy v. Berry (1659) 2 Sid. 155 applied ... Dictum in Doe d. Stevens v. Lord (1838) 6 Dowl. 256 considered ... The plaintiff, Hugh Anthony Aglionby, let ... ...
