Lacy v Berry

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1657
Date01 January 1657
CourtCourt of the King's Bench

English Reports Citation: 82 E.R. 1308

King's Bench Division

Lacy
and
Berry

lacy versus berry. Challenge. En un tryall al Bar p un jury de Bedfordshire la fuit un challenge al un des jurors, pur ceo q fuit de kin. Et le Chief Justice dit, que quant le challenge que le juror est del sanke le pi' appiert de record ceo est principal challenge, mes quant nest forsq^ p mrns del councel come ore la nest forsque challenge pur cause del favour. Et puis un longe evidence que fuit si le grant del rent charge (ore in quaere) fuit fraudulent le pi' en le repl' (quant les jurors voil aver done lour verdict) esteant call ne voil appear (perceivant que le jury ad trove pur defendant). Et uncore nient obstant il ne voil appear le Court prist le verdict des jurors queux trove pur defendant, & assess dams & costs. Nota que verdict nest usualment pris en auters actions aps nonsuit del pi'. Trfis & ejectment fuit port de tres en Northumberland, & declarations deliver s que verdicts sur evidence fuer' trove pur pi' vers ascun, & judgment vers casual ejector pur autera en tout al 47 meases sur culler del hab. fac. possessionem, s ceo le vie turue hors de possession ceux 47 tenants, & 80 auter tents de lour meases & tenements sans SSID. U6. TEE. PAJ3CH. 1659 IN SUP. BANCO 1309 ascun process ou plea vers eux pur 1'exeoution de quel brief de hab. fac. possess, le vie ad del pi' 2001. come ses fees. Et 1. Le Court ne voil grant ascun brief de supercede ceo execution vers le 80 car si serra, doit estre quia erronice, & la ne fuit ascun error en le...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • McPhail v Persons, Names Unknown; Bristol Corporation v Ross
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 24 May 1973
    ...the owner was entitled to take possession at once by his own hand, see Harris v. Austen (1616) 1 Rolls at page 213 by Chief Justice Coke; Lacy v. Berry (1659) 2 Siderfin at page 155/6; Aglionby v. Cohen (1955) 1 Q. B. 14Seeing that the owner could take possession at once without the help o......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT