Leduc & Company v Ward
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 13 February 1888 |
| Date | 13 February 1888 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
29 cases
-
Unicredit Bank A.G. v Euronav N.v
...being concluded prior to issue between the shipper and the carrier (see e.g. Sewell v Burdick (1884) 10 App Cas 74, 105, Leduc v Ward (1888) 20 QBD 475, 479–480). Hence s. 5 of COGSA defines the contract of carriage in relation to a bill of lading as being the contract “contained in or evid......
-
Frenkel v MacAndrews & Company
...to preclude one from coming to the above conclusion? The only cases which it is really necessary to consider are those of Leduc v. Ward, 20 Q.B.D. 475 and Margetson v. Glynn, 1892, 1 Q.B. 337 and the same case of Glynn v. Margetson, 1893, A.C. 351. 66 In Leduc v. Ward no question as to the......
-
Alianca Navegacao E Logistica Ltda v Ameropa SA
...ship or hired for the special purpose of the voyage, to proceed without unnecessary deviation in the usual and customary course”); Leduc & Co v Ward & Others (1880) 20 QBD 475, 481 per Lord Esher MR (CA) (“ it must be a voyage on the ordinary track by sea of the voyage from the one place to......
-
Stag Line Ltd v Foscolo, Mango & Company Ltd
...v. Golding 1865, 13 L. T. Rep. 291 L. Rep. 1, C. P. 69 Leduc v. WardDID=ASPMELR 1888, 6 Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 290 58 L. T. Rep. 908 20 Q. B. Div. 475 Knutsford Steamship v. TillmansDID=ASPM 11 Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 105 99. L. T. Rep. 399 (1908) A. C. 406 Lavabre v. WilsonENR 1779, 1 Douglas, 284 ......
Request a trial to view additional results