Lockyer v Ferryman
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 06 March 1877 |
| Docket Number | No. 4. |
| Date | 06 March 1877 |
| Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
33 cases
-
Morrison Rose & Partners v Hillman
...is unwarranted. 21 The object of estoppel perremjudicatam is succinctly expressed by Lord Blackburn in ( Lockyer v. Ferryman 2 A.C. 519) at page 530, where he says: "The object of the rule of resjudicata is always put upon two grounds - the one public policy, that it is in the interest of t......
- Chan Yuow Seng v Ling Ong Hua
-
Arklow Holidays Ltd v Bord Pleanála and Others
...v BORD PLEANALA 1998 3 IR 453 GREEN DALE BUILDING CO LTD, IN RE 1977 IR 256 D v C 1984 ILRM 173 1983/8/2366 LOCKYER v FERRYMAN 1876-77 2 APP CAS 519 BELTON v CARLOW CO COUNCIL 1997 1 IR 172 1997 2 ILRM 405 1998/2/397 TALBOT v BERKSHIRE CO COUNCIL 1994 QB 290 1993 3 WLR 708 1993 4 AER 9......
-
Barrow v Bankside Members Agency Ltd and Another
...certain circumstances) as a form of cause of action estoppel. 33The object of the rule of res judicata was said by Lord Blackburn in Lockyer v Ferryman (1877) 2 App.Cas.519 at 530 to be put on two grounds—the one public policy, that it is in the interest of the state that there should be an......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Litigation
...“[F]inality is a good thing but justice is a better”: Ras Behari Lal v King-Emperor (1933) 50 TLR 1 at 2. 1369 Lockyer v Freeman (1877) 2 App Cas 519 at 530, per Lord Blackburn; Morrison Rose & Partners v Hillman [1961] 2 QB 266 at 276, per Holroyd Pearce LJ; Mills v Cooper [1967] 2 QB 459 ......