Lockyer v Ferryman
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 06 March 1877 |
| Date | 06 March 1877 |
| Docket Number | No. 4. |
| Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
34 cases
-
Morrison Rose & Partners v Hillman
...a deduction is unwarranted. 21 The object of estoppel perremjudicatam is succinctly expressed by Lord Blackburn in ( Lockyer v. Ferryman 2 A.C. 519) at page 530, where he says: "The object of the rule of resjudicata is always put upon two grounds - the one public policy, that it is in the i......
- Chan Yuow Seng v Ling Ong Hua
-
Arklow Holidays Ltd v Bord Pleanála and Others
...v BORD PLEANALA 1998 3 IR 453 GREEN DALE BUILDING CO LTD, IN RE 1977 IR 256 D v C 1984 ILRM 173 1983/8/2366 LOCKYER v FERRYMAN 1876-77 2 APP CAS 519 BELTON v CARLOW CO COUNCIL 1997 1 IR 172 1997 2 ILRM 405 1998/2/397 TALBOT v BERKSHIRE CO COUNCIL 1994 QB 290 1993 3 WLR 708 1993 4 AER 9......
-
Rowe v Rowe
...authority on estoppel per rem judicatam", and he goes for a statement of the principle to some words of Lord Blackburn in the case of Lockyer v. Ferryman, reported in 1877. Lord Blackburn said this: "The object of the rule of res judicata is always put upon two grounds - the one public poli......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Litigation
...“[F]inality is a good thing but justice is a better”: Ras Behari Lal v King-Emperor (1933) 50 TLR 1 at 2. 1369 Lockyer v Freeman (1877) 2 App Cas 519 at 530, per Lord Blackburn; Morrison Rose & Partners v Hillman [1961] 2 QB 266 at 276, per Holroyd Pearce LJ; Mills v Cooper [1967] 2 QB 459 ......