London Congregational Union Inc. v Harriss & Harriss
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1986 |
| Year | 1986 |
| Date | 1986 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
35 cases
-
URS Corporation Ltd v BDW Trading Ltd
...that the cause of action accrued when the cracking began. 74 The ‘doomed from the start’ argument also arose in London Congregational Union Inc v Harriss & Harriss [1988] 1 All E.R. 15, the last of these cases decided before Murphy. In that case the church hall was completed in January 197......
-
Joy Douglas and Others v Barclays Bank Plc and Another
...prove that the action was filed in time. Reference was made to the case of London Congregational Union Inc. v. Harris & Harris (a firm) [1988] 1 All ER 15 in support of this submission. 22 He also made the point that time began to run from the date when the causes of action accrued. It was ......
-
Leroy McGregor v Verda Francis
...to prove that the action was brought within the limitation period. InLondon Congregational Union Inc. v. Harris & Harris (a firm) [1988] 1 All E.R. 15 [1988] 1 All E.R. 15 at 30, Ralph Gibson, L.J. said: ‘The onus lies on the plaintiffs to prove that their cause of action accrued within the......
-
O'Sullivan v Ireland, the Attorney General
...knowledge is on the plaintiff; see Farrell v Ryan [2015] IEHC 275 at paragraph 15 and London Congregational Union v Harriss & Harriss [1988] 1 All ER 15. In that, however, it should be borne in mind that litigation is not a game and that the function of a judge is at all times to ascertai......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
The Designer's Duty - Time For Review
...New Islington and Hackney Housing Association, see note 14, at para 41. 46. In London Congregational Union Inc v Harriss & Harriss [1988] 1 All ER 15, CA, approving Kemsley and Millbourn Holdings Ltd v J Jarvis & Sons Ltd (1983) 1 Const LJ 79, QBD(OR). 47. Pirelli General Cable Work......
2 books & journal articles
-
Litigation
...of impression, taking a broad-brush approach. 214 For example, where an action 207 London Congregational Union Inc v Harriss & Harriss [1988] 1 All ER 15 at 28–29, per Ralph Gibson LJ, at 33, per Sir Denys Buckley; Bank of East Asia Ltd v Tsien Wui Marble Factory Ltd (1999) 2 HKCFAR 349 at ......
-
Defects
...(1980) 18 BLr 50; Crump v Torfaen BC (1981) 19 BLr 84 at 93–96, per Balcombe J. 186 London Congregational Union Inc v Harriss & Harriss [1988] 1 all Er 15 at 22, per ralph Gibson LJ. Compare Linklaters Business Services v Sir Robert McAlpine Ltd [2010] EWhC 2931 (TCC) at [113], where akenhe......