London General Omnibus Company v Lavell
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1901 |
| Year | 1901 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
20 cases
-
Buckingham v Daily News Ltd
...mere opinion or impression which he himself had gained at the view. 15 He cited in support of that submission the case of London General Omnibus Company Ltd, v. Lavell (1901. 1 Ch., 135). That was a case that was decided by Mr Justice Farwell in the Court of first Instance, and this report ......
- Manager, Tuborg (M) Sdn Bhd v PP
-
Dick et Al v R
...raised, to follow the evidence and to apply it: Kessouri Isar v. Great Indian Peninsula Railway Co. (1826) E.R. 665, London General Omnibus Co. Ltd. v. Lavell [1901] 1 Ch., 135 at p. 139, and Cole v. United Davies (London) Ltd. [1941] 1 K.B.100 or to have simply a visual survey or assessmen......
-
Evans v The Queen
...185 R v Whalley (1847) 2 Car & K 376 [175 ER 155] (visit to scene of alleged rape); R v Martin (1872) LR 1 CCR 378; London General Omnibus Co Ltd v Lavell [1901] 1 Ch 135 (inspection by judge hearing passing off cases of two omnibuses in the courtyard of the Royal Courts of Justice); Kessow......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Preliminary Sections
...& Anor v. Babalola Olojo (1983) 8 S C 61 ................................................ 681 London General Omnibus Co. v. LaveIl (1901) 1 Ch. 135. ......393 London Joint Stock Bank v. Macmillan (1918) A.0 777 at 818. ......181 Lori & Anor v. The State (1980) 8-11 S.C. 81 at 87. ......549 ......
-
Litigation
...the general rule as to the civil burden of proof. One is where a bailee is sued in negligence 969 London General Omnibus Co Ltd v Lavell [1901] 1 Ch 135 at 138–139, per Lord Alverstone CJ; Unsted v Unsted (1947) 47 SR (NSW) 495 at 498, per Davidson J; Scott v Numurkah Corporation (1954) 91 ......
-
Courts 2
...Ag. P., said: – “ It will suffice, in my opinion, if we recall the purpose of such visits as defined in London Omnibus Co. v. Lavell (1901) Ch. 135 when Lord Alverstone said: - “I have never heard it said, and speaking for myself, I should be very sorry to endorse the idea that a Judge is e......