Mahmud v Mahmud

JurisdictionScotland
Year1994
Date1994
CourtCourt of Session (Outer House)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Aneeka Sohrab (ap) V. Raja Sulman Khan (ap)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 23 April 2002
    ...before answer on the question of threat. She referred me to Fraser on Husband and Wife, Vol. 1, 226 and to the case of Mahmud v Mahmud 1994 S.L.T. 599, a case decided after proof. The case of Gall v Gall 1968 S.C. 332 was also noticed. [14]Miss Wise then moved to her second plea-in-law, con......
  • June Kaur Or Singh (ap) V. Bikramjit Singh
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 22 July 2005
    ...as to vitiate consent to marry was discussed by Lord Sutherland in Mahmood v Mahmood 1993 SLT 589 and by Lord Prosser in Mahmud v Mahmud 1994 SLT 599. The previous English decisions dealing with the issue are discussed in theses two cases. In Mahmood at p 591C - D Lord Sutherland quoted the......
  • Re P (Forced Marriage)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • Invalid date
  • Sohrab v Khan
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session (Outer House)
    • 23 April 2002
    ...a proof. Cases referred to: Bradley v Mochrie 1947 SLT (Notes) 27 Gall v GallSC 1968 SC 332 Mahmood v Mahmood 1993 SLT 589 Mahmud v Mahmud 1994 SLT 599 Saleh v Saleh 1987 SLT 633 Textbooks referred to: Difficulties with the marriage laws: Pandora Clifford and Ivo Curwen, Scots Law News 25 S......
3 books & journal articles
  • City of Edinburgh Council v S. Forced Marriage in Scotland: The Legal Response
    • United Kingdom
    • Edinburgh Law Review No. , January 2016
    • 1 January 2016
    ...the pursuer's will to be overborne and to vitiate his/her consent to marry, decree of nullity will be granted.3 3 E.g. Mahmud v Mahmud 1994 SLT 599; Mahmood v Mahmood 1993 SLT 589; Sohrab v Kahn 2002 SLT 1255; and Singh v Singh 2005 SLT Forced marriage Forced marriage has been defined as:4 ......
  • The Relevance of Reverence; Undue Influence Civilian Style
    • United Kingdom
    • Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law No. 10-4, December 2003
    • 1 December 2003
    ...see paras 4 f. of the unreported judgment), following Hislop v. Dickson Motors (Forres) Ltd (1978) SLT 73; cf. also Mahmud v. Mahmud (1994) SLT 599 (602). 138. Wolfson v. Edelman (1952) SLT 97 (98); Hislop v. Dickson Motors (Forres) Ltd (1978) SLT 73 (75 f.); Russo v. Hardy (unreported Oute......
  • UK Initiatives on Forced Marriage: Regulation, Dialogue and Exit
    • United Kingdom
    • Political Studies No. 52-3, October 2004
    • 1 October 2004
    ...CasesAv. J (Nullity Proceedings) [1989] 1 FRR 110Hirani v. Hirani [1983] 4 FLR 232Mahmood v. Mahmood [1993] SLT 589Mahmud v. Mahmud [1994] SLT 599 548 ANNE PHILLIPS AND MOIRA DUSTINRv. Ahmed Shah Moied and Others [1986] 8 Cr. App. R (S) 44Rv. Ghulam Rasool [1990–91] 12 Cr. App. R (S) 771Rv.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT