‘Management by Contract’: A Study of Programmatic and Technological Aspects
Date | 01 September 2001 |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00275 |
Author | Roland Almqvist |
Published date | 01 September 2001 |
‘MANAGEMENT BY CONTRACT’:
A STUDY OF PROGRAMMATIC AND
TECHNOLOGICAL ASPECTS
ROLAND ALMQVIST
The practice of ‘Management by Contract’ can – as with any practice – be charac-
terized by programmatic and technological dimensions. These dimensionscontain
concepts and ideas at the programmatic level, which shape the mission of the prac-
tice (concrete tasks and routines) at the technologicallevel. Thus, the former attach
the practice to the broader conceptual dimension. In this paper both of these dimen-
sions will be analysed. The aim is to study how quality issues have been managed
by contract. The first part presents some of the conceptual arguments of ‘Manage-
ment by Contract’. The arguments of a structure generally used (the
Purchaser/Provider split) and a method often used (competitive tendering)will be
discussed. The second part presents some technological effects through empirical
findings. The paper concludes with an analysis of theinteraction or non-interaction
between these two dimensions.
INTRODUCTION
The option of entering into a contract for various goods and serviceshas
been utilized by the public sector from time immemorial. An exampleof
this would be contracts for major projects and constructions,where the
public sector organization itself does not have the necessary skill and com-
petence. However, over the past 20 yearsthere hasbeen a noticeable
increase in activities (both support and coreactivities) that are put outto
tender with public organizations in the role of the purchaser. This develop-
ment is a global phenomenon and is taking place at a particularly rapid
pace in countries such as the USA and the UK (Walsh 1995).Inthis develop-
ment we have also been able to perceive atendency for the public sector
to look on other established institutions asexamples: institutions such as
the Market or the Company (Brunsson 1992, 1998). Thismeans, amongst
other things, that quasi-markets have emerged in which potentialproducers
compete by submitting tenders to carry out the publicservice during the
agreed time period (Le Grand and Bartlett1993). It also signifiesa belief
in a more action-oriented administration withinpublicorganizationand
where the concept and phenomenon of ‘management by contract’ is tohelp
form the basis for the management of quality and objectives of the activity
purchased. In a sense we can thus saythat the contract has become a meta-
phor for capturing the change inmanagement and control within the public
Roland Almqvist is a doctoral studentat theSchool ofBusiness, Stockholm University.
Public Administration Vol. 79 No. 3, 2001 (689–706)
Blackwell Publishers Ltd. 2001, 108 Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 1JF, UK and 350 Main Street,
Malden, MA 02148, USA.
690ROLAND ALMQVIST
sector. A paradigm shift is saidto be inprogress towards management by
contract instead of the previous management by hierarchy (Burns et al. 1994).
As a researcher one presumably has the perception thatparadigm shifts
are not concerned with trifles. They are oftenaccompanied by complex
processes involving the re-examination of earlier conceptions, reflection and
sometimes great soul-searching. It is thus noexaggeration to maintain that
the transformation of management systems and processes within thepublic
sector into management by contract may involve asubstantial change in
old notions. These changed views emanate from a numberof new (orat
least current) and transforming ideas. If the ideas regiment our conceptions
in the longer term, then what we generallycall an institutionis formed.
The ideas may also have practical consequences. Sometimes theidea and
practice may be in harmony with each other; at othertimes they may not
harmonise at all. In the presentstudy it is therefore important to differen-
tiate between the concept and the phenomenon of ‘management by con-
tract’(cf. Mattessich 1995) since the latter situation may posean obstacle
to the analysis and understanding of an institution. This means that good
analyses of an institution as an idea may be misleading if they are usedto
analyse the practice of it, and vice versa. In other words, therefore, it is
important to differentiate analytically between idea and practice
(Brunsson 1992).
We can also express the above argument intermsof aprogrammatic
and a technological dimension respectively (refer for example toMeyer and
Rowan 1977; Rose and Miller 1992; Miller and O’Leary 1998; Miller and
Rose 1998). The programmatic dimension incorporates the main concept
and ideas. In purely general terms, programmes can be related to the nor-
mative concept and ideas, which are then transformedand introduced into
a specific activity in order thereby to form itstask in practice. Focusing on
the latter, we can then talk abouta technological dimension. This is where
the technologies that are engendered in the transformationand the inter-
action between these two dimensions are found (Almqvist and Skoog 1999).
Here we are concerned with concrete tasksand routines that help to create
a world for the practitioners. If we look at the phenomenon of ‘management
by contract’, the technological dimension may include the development of
different management control systems or models inthe enterprise. Theaims
of these models may be, for example, well thought-out purchaserfunctions,
management control systems for costs and quality, MBO-models, perform-
ance measurement systems, and so on. Theprogrammatic dimension thus
links the practice and its technologies to the broader and more generally
held objectives that exist in its conceptualsphere. Moreover, it is more or
less taken for granted that thepractice iscapable ofoperationalizing,
implementing and meeting these goals (Power 1997); inother words, that
it is possible to construct technologies with a view to meeting these goals.
Thus, just as in the case ofotherphenomenathere isagain a whole range
of ideas concerning how this phenomenon shouldbe designed, for example,
Blackwell Publishers Ltd. 2001
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
