Mathews v Chichester
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 25 July 1861 |
| Date | 25 July 1861 |
| Court | High Court of Chancery |
English Reports Citation: 54 E.R. 840
ROLLS COURT
[135] mathews v. chichester. July 25, 18:51. Plaintifts, resident abroad, being ordered to give security for costs, afterwards came to reside within the jurisdiction. The order was thereupon discharged, the Plaintiffs paying the costs of the application. The Plaintiffs, being resident abroad, au order was made for security for costs. The Plaintiffs having returned to and being resident within the jurisdiction, Mr. Selwyu and Mr. Babington now moved to discharge the order. They relied on O'Conner v. Sierra Nevada Company (24 Beav. 435). Mr. Lloyd and Mr. Bird, co-ntm. the master of the bolls [Sir John Romilly]. I think I must discharge the order, but the Plaintiffs, coming for an indulgence, must...
To continue reading
Request your trial
- Andreas Syrimi and Marianna Syrimi v Colin Wayne Hinds and Susan Jean Hinds [NTLR]
-
Howard v Howard
...Div. Before HARRISON, O'BRIEN, and HOLMES, JJ. HOWARD and HOWARD O'connor v. Sierra Nevada Co.ENR 24 Beav. 435. Mathews v. ChichesterENR 30 Beav. 135. Ross v. GreenENR 10 Ex. 891. Place v. campbell 6D. & L. 113. Palmer v. Lord Ashbrook 4 Ir. Jur.(O. S.) 193. Eyre v. BaldwinUNK 4 Ir. C. L. R......
-
Re Hartshill Endowment
...relating to divine service in the church ought to be determined by the proper authority, the bishop. Thirdly, 840 MATHEVVS V. CHICHESTER 30 BEAV. 135. that after the consecration of the church, no alteration could be made by the donor in the trusts of the fund provided for and devoted to it......