McCafferty v Metropolitan Police District Receiver
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1977 |
| Year | 1977 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
47 cases
-
R (C) v Middlesbrough Council; A v Hoare and other appeals
...either pre-existing or consequent upon the injury which he has suffered. This question was first considered in McCafferty v Metropolitan Police District Receiver [1977] 1 WLR 1073, 1081, soon after the 1975 Act had come into force. After reading the then equivalent of subsection 14(2), Geo......
-
McCoubrey v Ministry of Defence
...were, in essence, that the judge had in mind the appropriate passages in the authorities, in particular a case called McCafferty v Metropolitan Police Receiver [1977] 1 WLR 1073 and a case called Dobbie v Medway Health Authority [1994] 1 WLR 1234. Thus he was of the view that the judge had ......
-
Whitely v Minister for Defence
...in s. 2(1)(b) of the Act of 1991 ought to be understood to any particular terms. McCafferty v. Metropolitan Police ReceiverWLR [1977] 1 W.L.R. 1073; Miller v. London ElectricalUNK [1976] 2 Lloyds Rep. 284; Knipe v. British Railways BoardELR [1972] 1 Q.B. 361 distinguished. 2. That the test ......
-
Yvonne Ferris Claimant v Dickenson Bay Management Ltd Defendant [ECSC]
...not the injury suffered by the Claimant was significant was formulated by Geoffrey Lane LJ inMcCafferty v. Metropolitan Police Receiver [1977] 2 All ER 756. In that case the Court of Appeal considered sections 11 and 14 of the 1980 Limitation Act of England which are identical to our sectio......
Request a trial to view additional results