Mellor v Walmesley
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1905 |
| Date | 1905 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 cases
-
Tito v Waddell (No. 2); Tito v Attorney General; Ocean Island (No. 2)
...in a conveyance mean prima facie the foreshore (seeScratton v. Brown (1825) 4 B. & C. 485; Mellor v. Walmesley [1904] 2 Ch. 525; [1905] 2 Ch. 164, C.A.). Their Lordships see no reason why the same prima facie meaning should not be attributed to the words 'sea beach.'" In that passage, I wou......
-
Attorney-General v M'Carthy
...& Cl. 178. (2) 4 D. G. & J. 55. (3) 4 B. &C. 485. (4) 7 H. & N. 151. (5) 1 Times L. R. 675. (6) [1904] 2 Ch. 534. (7) [1904] 2 Ch. 525; [1905] 2 Ch. 164. (1) 4 C. P. D. (2) 4 D. G. & J. 55 (3) [1896] 2 Ch. 1, 12. (4) 5 Bing. 163; 3 B. & C. 91; 2 Bligh (N.S.), 147; 1 Dow & Cl. 178. (5) 5 M. ......
-
R v McGuire
...book were received as evidence of the delivery of the beer." He then goes on to cite Pritt v. Fairclough (1812) 3 Camp. 305 and Mellor v. Walmsley (1905) 2 Ch. 164, to which reference will have to be made again in a moment. 18 In Phipson on Evidence, Thirteenth Edition, the matter is set ou......
-
Arturo Matus v Attorney General of Belize
...formerly part of the riverbed belonging to the owner of a fishery; Mercer vs. Denne [1904] 2 Ch 534 (affd.) [1905] 2 Ch 538, CA); Mellor vs. Walmesley [1905] 2 Ch 164, CA, where the land between the medium and high water mark and that described in a conveyance was held to be an accretion......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Royal Demesne
...at Somerset House will simply vest in Her Majesty. 12 Attorney-General v Chambers (1854) 4 De GM&G 206. See also Mellor v Walmsley [1905] 2 Ch 164. 13 [1993] 1 WLR 1156. 396 The Law of the Manor fishery he may also own the river bed even if it is always under water. Likewise, some corporati......
-
Table of Cases
...7.13 Meddick v Shiplake Parish Council (1999) Dec (unreported) 7.13 Mellacher v Austria (1989) 12 EHRR 391, ECHR 25.11 Mellor v Walmsley [1905] 2 Ch 164, 74 LJ Ch 475, 93 LT 574 24.4 Mellstrom v Badgworthy Land Co Ltd (2010) LR Adj 2008/1498, 2009/0290, 2009/0953 6.9, 14.7 Melwich v Luter (......