Mills v British Rail Engineering Ltd
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1992 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
17 cases
-
Allen v Ebanks
...unreported. (6) -Mallett v. McMonagle, [1970] A.C. 166; [1969] 2 All E.R. 178, not followed. (7) -Mills v. British Rail Engr. Ltd., [1992] P.I.Q.R. Q130, dicta of Dillon, L.J. applied. (8) -O”Keefe v. Webb, English High Ct., March 14th, 1995, Kemp & Kemp, Release 62, March 1997, para. A4–01......
-
Patricia Georgina Grant (widow and executrix of the estate of Douglas Michael Grant, deceased) v The Secretary of State for Transport
...is £92,500. Care and assistance 28 The basis for awards for care and assistance (or care and attendance) is explained in Mills v British Rail Engineering Ltd [1992] PIQR Q130. Dillon LJ said this at Q137: "To my mind there can be no justification in principle for differentiating between ful......
- Dunnachie v Kingston upon Hull City Council; Williams v Southampton Institute; Dawson v Stonham Housing Association
-
Tyrell Oneal Mccollin v Sheradon Holder and Darrie Hoyte
...his bedroom and bathroom; and grocery shopping.” 105 The Claimant's Counsel referred me to Mills v. British Rail Engineering Ltd [1992] PIQR Q130; Cunningham v. Harrison [1973] Q.B. 942 and Donnelly v. Joyce [1974] QB 454 for guidance in respect of the applicable principles. These are all......
Request a trial to view additional results