Morrison (James) & Company v Shaw, Savill, and Albion Company
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Year | 1916 |
Date | 1916 |
Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
30 cases
-
Yeoman Credit Ltd v Apps
...be found applied in cases of marine Insurance (Marine Insurance Act, 1906, sections 45-48) carriage by sea and river ( Morrison & Co. v. Shaw, Savill & Albion Company, Davis v. Garrott) by land ( Mallet v. Great Eastern Railway Company, Lilley v. Doubleday) and contracts of Bailment. 'The p......
-
Stag Line Ltd v Foscolo, Mango & Company Ltd
...Div. 295 Morrison (James) and Co. v. Shaw, Savill, and Albion Company LimitedDID=ASPMELR 13 Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 504 115 L. T. Rep. 508 (1916) 2 K. B. 783 Tillmanns and Co. v. Steamship Knutsford LimitedELRDID=ASPM 99 L. T. Rep. 399 (1908) 2 K. B. 385 11 Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 105 Baerselman v. B......
-
Frenkel v MacAndrews & Company
...seems that there was proof of a custom to deviate which justified the deviation." 33 And in the case of Morrison and Co. v. Shaw Park, 1916, 2 KB. 783, Lord Phillimore says, page 797:— "It may be, if it is customary for the line to which the ship belongs, to the knowledge of the shipper, to......
-
Suisse Atlantique Société d'Armement Maritime S.A. v N.v Rotterdamsche Kolen Centrale (Silvretta.)
...be shown that the loss would have happened in any event (see United States Shipping Board v. Bunge y Born 23 LL.List Reports 257; Morrison v. Shaw Savill [1916] 2 K.B. 783). It was not, however, until this century that deviation was finally established as a fundamental breach. This was fir......
Request a trial to view additional results