Munkenbeck & Marshall v McAlpine
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1995 |
| Date | 1995 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 cases
-
Burgess and Others v Stevedoring Services Ltd
...the Defendants De Groote 1991 Civil Jur. No. 148 EMI Records v WallaceUNK [1982] 2 All ER 980 Munkenbeck & Marshall (A Firm) v McAlpineUNK 44 Con LR 30 Rules of the Supreme Court, O. 62, R. 4(1) Application to stay execution of order pending appeal — Stay against costs — Indemnity costs RUL......
-
Nike Real Estate Ltd v De Bruyne
...Inv. Trust PLC, Queen”s Bench Division, 1994, unreported, dicta of Millett J. applied. (9) Munkenbeck & Marshall v. McAlpineUNK(1995), 44 Con. L.R. 30; [1995] E.G.C.S. 24, referred to. Civil Procedure-costs-costs as damages-no power to award as damages costs unrecovered under party and part......
-
London Borough of Southwark v Nejad & Others
...Investment Trust plc ( unreported, 10 December 1993) approved in the Court of Appeal in Munkenbeck & Marshall (A Firm) v McAlpine (1995) 44 Con. L.R. 30 at 33, the discretion to order indemnity costs is not to be circumscribed beyond the requirement that taxation on an indemnity basis must ......
-
Kuwait Oil Tanker Company Sak and Another (Plaintiffs) Abdul Fattah Sulaiman Khaled Al Bader and Others (Defendants) H. Clarkson & Company Ltd and Others (third Parties)
...a variety of different circumstances. The court has a very broad discretion in this matter. Indeed, in Munkenbeck & Marshall v. McAlpine 44 Con.L.R. 30, Hollis J. regretted that various courts had attempted to define the circumstances in which indemnity costs might be ordered because in eac......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Litigation
...Ltd v HGP Greentree Allchurch Evans Ltd [2006] BLR 45 at 49 [27], per HHJ Coulson QC. See also Munkenbeck & Marshall v McAlpine (1995) 44 Con LR 30 (CA); Gotch v Enelco Ltd [2015] EWHC 1802 (TCC ) ; Dixon v Radley House Partnership [2016] EWHC 3485 (QB) at [9], per Stuart-Smith J; Car Giant......