Nageh v Giddings and another

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Neutral Citation[2006] EWHC 3240 (TCC)
Date2006
Year2006
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
1 cases
  • Primus Build Ltd v Pompey Centre Ltd & Slidesilver Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 16 Junio 2009
    ...points as to the service of documents in adjudications have not generally found favour with the Courts: see, for example, Nageh v Richard Giddings & Anr [2006] EWHC 3240 TCC. However, that general approach is not always appropriate. If, say, it can be shown that the responding party was ke......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Construction, Property & Real Estate (Case Law Review, Issue 2 – February 2007)
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 15 Marzo 2007
    ...and Arbitration List in the High Court is currently operating a pilot voluntary mediation scheme. Lucy Garrett Nageh v Richard Giddings [2007] CILL 2420 The defendants failed in their application to set aside summary judgment of an adjudication decision against them, arguing they were unawa......
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume I - Third Edition
    • 13 Abril 2020
    ...4 all Er 565 II.8.07, II.8.120, II.8.134, II.8.135 Nader v Sutherland Shire Council [2008] NSWCa 265 III.18.29 Nageh v Giddings [2006] EWhC 3240 (TCC) III.26.176 Nahas Construction pty Ltd, In the matter of [2012] NSWSC 797 III.22.34 Nai Genova, he [1984] 1 Lloyd’s rep 353 I.3.201 Najjar v ......
  • Litigation
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume III - Third Edition
    • 13 Abril 2020
    ...Co (HK) Ltd v Yau Lee Construction Co Ltd [1999] HKCFI 1101. 740 Compare Lal v Bimbrah [1997] EWCA Civ 959; Nageh v Giddings [2006] EWHC 3240 (TCC). 741 he late iling of a defence, without being granted an extension of time by the court for iling the defence, will not cure a defendant’s pos......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT