Norman v Great Western Railway Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1915 |
| Year | 1915 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
29 cases
-
London Graving Dock Company Ltd v Horton
...assistance from the alternative word "unexpected" suggested by Lord Phillimore (then Phillimore, L.J.), in Norman v. G.W. Rly. Coy. [1915] 1 K.B. 584: I think "unusual" is used in an objective sense and means such danger as is not usually found in carrying out the task or fulfilling the fu......
-
Mersey Docks and Harbour Board v Procter
...probation.'" 13 Similar expressions are to be found in the judgments of the Court of Appeal in ( Norman v. Great Western Railway L.R., 1915, 1 K.B., 584), and I think that they apply with great force to the present case. 14 It is impossible not to feel compassion for the Respondent in her l......
-
Sand and Company Limited v SA Railways & Harbours
...The defendant's only duty to the public was to safeguard them from traps and hidden dangers. See Norman v Great Western Railway Co. (1915, 1 K.B. 584); Hill v Pettigrew (1936, A.C. 69). Invitees who came to the yard had to make reasonable use of it. It was unreasonable for plaintiff to cros......
-
Fairman v Perpetual Investment Building Society
...a great deal more than I think it does decide, and unless your Lordships think it is right in so deciding. 57In Norman v. G.W.R. (1915, 1 K.B. 584) and Dobson v. Horsley (1915, 1 K.B. 634) I have already in the Court of Appeal commented upon Indermaur v. Dames and Miller v. Hancock, and t......
Request a trial to view additional results